Literature DB >> 20495925

Normative data for a solution-based taste test.

Janine Pingel1, Jürgen Ostwald, Hans Wilhelm Pau, Thomas Hummel, Tino Just.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to study gustatory function in a large portion of the general population using liquid tastants, extending previous research. Further, we investigated the test-retest reliability of the test used. Data from 944 healthy subjects were used (498 women and 446 men, mean age 45 years; age range 5-90 years). For lateralized assessment of gustatory function, liquid taste solutions were used with different concentrations of each tastant (sweet 0.03, 0.1, 0.4, 2 g/mL sucrose solution; sour 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 mL citric acid; salty 0.025, 0.075, 0.15, 0.36 mL sodium chloride solution; bitter 0.0002, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.01 mL quinine hydrochloride). A drop (approximately 20 µL) of liquid tastant was applied on the right side or on the left side of the anterior/posterior third of the extended tongue. The taste test had a good test-retest reliability r (304) = 0.78 (P < 0.001) for the total score and r (304) = 0.77 (P < 0.001) for the right-sided measures and r (304) = 0.75 (P < 0.001) for the left-sided measures, respectively. Gustatory sensitivity was found to decrease with age; women were more sensitive to gustatory stimuli than men. Irrespective of the sex-related differences, the total score at the 10th percentile was 28 in subjects younger than 15 years, 26.1 for ages from 16 to 35 years, 25 for ages from 36 to 55 years, and 24 for subjects older than 56 years of age. In conclusion, this test is recommended for clinical assessment of the ability to taste. The test provides reliable data, which is easy to handle, inexpensive, timesaving and can be self-made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495925     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1276-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Electro-gustometry: a method for clinical taste examinations.

Authors:  B KRARUP
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1958 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 2.  Clinical evaluation of the sense of taste.

Authors:  L Bartoshuk
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.697

3.  A test for the screening of taste function.

Authors:  T Hummel; A Erras; G Kobal
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Basis and practice of clinical taste examinations.

Authors:  H Tomita; M Ikeda; Y Okuda
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.863

5.  Regional taste sensitivity to NaCl: relationship to subject age, tongue locus and area of stimulation.

Authors:  T Matsuda; R L Doty
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.

Authors:  G Kobal; L Klimek; M Wolfensberger; H Gudziol; A Temmel; C M Owen; H Seeber; E Pauli; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation.

Authors:  Akiko Fukunaga; Hiroshi Uematsu; Kumiko Sugimoto
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function.

Authors:  R L Doty; P Shaman; M Dann
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1984-03

9.  Clinical use of electrogustometry: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tomita; Minoru Ikeda
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2002

10.  [Taste disorders and recovery of the taste function after middle ear surgery].

Authors:  T Just; J Homoth; S Graumüller; H W Pau
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.057

View more
  15 in total

1.  Exploring Ethnic Differences in Taste Perception.

Authors:  Johnny A Williams; Linda M Bartoshuk; Roger B Fillingim; Cedrick D Dotson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Flavor perception test: evaluation in patients with Kallmann syndrome.

Authors:  Luigi Maione; Elena Cantone; Immacolata Cristina Nettore; Gaetana Cerbone; Davide De Brasi; Nunzia Maione; Jacques Young; Carolina Di Somma; Antonio Agostino Sinisi; Maurizio Iengo; Paolo Emidio Macchia; Rosario Pivonello; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Assessment of Taste Function.

Authors:  Y Zhu; T Hummel
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

4.  Development of a Gustatory Function Test for Clinical Application in Korean Subjects.

Authors:  Chi Sang Hwang; Jin Won Kim; Salma Saud Al Sharhan; Jin Woong Kim; Hyung Ju Cho; Joo Heon Yoon; Chang Hoon Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Validation of a self-administered olfactory and gustatory test for the remotely evaluation of COVID-19 patients in home quarantine.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Giovanni Salzano; Marzia Petrocelli; Giovanna Deiana; Francesco Antonio Salzano; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Taste Function in Healthy Taiwanese Adults.

Authors:  Rong-San Jiang; Wen-Jiun Lin
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2019-04-28

7.  The effect of radiotherapy on taste sensation in head and neck cancer patients - a prospective study.

Authors:  Michal Asif; Assaf Moore; Noam Yarom; Aron Popovtzer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Influences of Age, Sex and Smoking Habit on Flavor Recognition in Healthy Population.

Authors:  Immacolata Cristina Nettore; Luigi Maione; Silvio Desiderio; Emma De Nisco; Fabiana Franchini; Giuseppe Palatucci; Paola Ungaro; Elena Cantone; Paolo Emidio Macchia; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  No Difference in Perceived Intensity of Linoleic Acid in the Oral Cavity between Obese and Nonobese Individuals.

Authors:  Robin M Tucker; Tiffany M Nuessle; Nicole L Garneau; Gregory Smutzer; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Influence of age and sex on taste function of healthy subjects.

Authors:  Jing-Jie Wang; Kai-Li Liang; Wen-Jiun Lin; Chih-Yi Chen; Rong-San Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.