Literature DB >> 20494023

Guidelines for donor lung selection: time for revision?

Karl G Reyes1, David P Mason, Lucy Thuita, Edward R Nowicki, Sudish C Murthy, Gösta B Pettersson, Eugene H Blackstone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data support current guidelines for donor selection in lung transplantation. We determined degree of compliance with current donor guidelines, effect of these and variances on survival, and other donor factors predicting survival.
METHODS: From July 1999 to June 2008, 10,333 primary transplants were performed in the US, with United Network for Organ Sharing data available for age, ABO type, chest radiograph, arterial difference in partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) greater than 300 on 100% fraction of inspired oxygen, smoking, absence of aspiration/sepsis, and purulent secretions. Multivariable survival methods were used to determine relevance of these and new variables, adjusted for recipient risk factors.
RESULTS: In 56% of transplants, variance from at least one guideline was observed: chest radiograph, 41%; smoking, 21%; and PaO(2), 18%; but rarely ABO compatibility (0.06%). Practice within guidelines was not associated with increased mortality. Common variances from guidelines; eg, PaO(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen down to 230, were not associated with increased mortality, but smoking (p = 0.02) was. New donor variables associated with increased mortality were diabetes (p = 0.001), presence of cytomegalovirus antibodies (p < 0.0001), recent smoking history (p = 0.02), African-American (p = 0.005), blood type A (p = 0.02), death other than from head trauma (p = 0.02), and gender (p = 0.02), race (p = 0.03), and size (p = 0.002) discordances.
CONCLUSIONS: Variance from current donor guidelines for lung transplantation is frequent; analysis suggests that donor PaO(2) ranges can be widened and a suspicious chest radiograph, evidence of sepsis, and purulent bronchial secretions ignored. Older age and smoking history appear to have a minor impact. New and possibly important factors identified suggest the need to better understand the impact of a wider range of donor variables on recipient outcomes. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20494023     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  22 in total

1.  Impact of Donor Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen on Outcomes After Lung Transplantation in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Recipients.

Authors:  Don Hayes; Benjamin T Kopp; Stephen E Kirkby; Susan D Reynolds; Heidi M Mansour; Joseph D Tobias; Dmitry Tumin
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Evaluation and Management of the Potential Lung Donor.

Authors:  Andrew Courtwright; Edward Cantu
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.878

3.  Single-lung transplantation in a chronic pulmonary emphysema patient with a marginal donor who was ABO blood group nonidentical but compatible.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Susaki; Masayoshi Inoue; Masato Minami; Yasushi Shintani; Tomoyuki Nakagiri; Noriyoshi Sawabata; Meinoshin Okumura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28

Review 4.  Lung donor selection criteria.

Authors:  John Chaney; Yoshikazu Suzuki; Edward Cantu; Victor van Berkel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A comparative analysis of bronchial stricture after lung transplantation in recipients with and without early acute rejection.

Authors:  Anthony W Castleberry; Mathias Worni; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Shu S Lin; Laurie D Snyder; Scott L Shofer; Scott M Palmer; Ricardo Pietrobon; R Duane Davis; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.

Authors:  Samantha E Halpern; Alec McConnell; Sarah B Peskoe; Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Ashley Y Choi; Megan L Neely; Scott M Palmer; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Benefit of a single recruitment maneuver after an apnea test for the diagnosis of brain death.

Authors:  Marie Paries; Nicolas Boccheciampe; Mathieu Raux; Bruno Riou; Olivier Langeron; Armelle Nicolas-Robin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Survival Benefit of Lung Transplantation in the Modern Era of Lung Allocation.

Authors:  David M Vock; Michael T Durheim; Wayne M Tsuang; C Ashley Finlen Copeland; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Megan L Neely; David J Lederer; Scott M Palmer
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-02

9.  Aggressive pursuit and utilization of non-ideal donor lungs does not compromise post-lung transplant survival.

Authors:  Samantha E Halpern; Oliver K Jawitz; Vignesh Raman; Ashley Y Choi; John C Haney; Jacob A Klapper; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.456

10.  Estimating the causal effect of treatment regimes for organ transplantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Boatman; David M Vock
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.