Literature DB >> 34218467

Aggressive pursuit and utilization of non-ideal donor lungs does not compromise post-lung transplant survival.

Samantha E Halpern1, Oliver K Jawitz2, Vignesh Raman2, Ashley Y Choi1, John C Haney2, Jacob A Klapper2, Matthew G Hartwig2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) vary in willingness to pursue and utilize non-ideal donor lungs; implications of these practices for lung transplant (LTx) recipients remain unclear. We examined associations between OPO-level behavior toward non-ideal donors and post-LTx outcomes.
METHODS: Adult lung donors and corresponding adult first-time LTx recipients in the 2008-2019 UNOS registry were included. Non-ideal donors had any of age > 50, smoking history ≥20 pack-years, PaO2 /FiO2 ratio ≤350, donation after circulatory death, or increased risk status. OPOs were classified as least, moderately, or most aggressive based on non-ideal donor pursuit, consent attainment, lung recovery, and transplantation. Post-transplant outcomes were compared among aggressiveness strata.
RESULTS: Of 22,795 recipients, 6229 (27.3%), 8256 (36.2%), and 8310 (36.5%) received lungs from least, moderately, and most aggressive OPOs, respectively. Moderately aggressive OPOs had the highest recipient rates of pre-discharge acute rejection, grade 3 primary graft dysfunction, postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and longest lengths of stay. After adjustment, moderately and most aggressive OPOs had similar risks of recipient mortality as least aggressive OPOs.
CONCLUSIONS: The most and least aggressive OPOs achieve similar patient survival and short-term post-LTx outcomes. Aggressive pursuit and utilization of non-ideal donor lungs by less aggressive OPOs would likely expand the donor pool, without compromising recipient outcomes.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extended-criteria donor; lung transplantation; organ procurement organization; patient survival

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34218467      PMCID: PMC8556224          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   3.456


  37 in total

1.  Guidelines for donor lung selection: time for revision?

Authors:  Karl G Reyes; David P Mason; Lucy Thuita; Edward R Nowicki; Sudish C Murthy; Gösta B Pettersson; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Importance of incorporating standardized, verifiable, objective metrics of organ procurement organization performance into discussions about organ allocation.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Seth Karp; Malay B Shah; Derek Dubay; Raymond Lynch
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  A Multicenter Study on Long-Term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation Comparing Donation After Circulatory Death and Donation After Brain Death.

Authors:  V van Suylen; B Luijk; R A S Hoek; E A van de Graaf; E A Verschuuren; C Van De Wauwer; J A Bekkers; R C A Meijer; W van der Bij; M E Erasmus
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction, part I: Definition and grading-A 2016 Consensus Group statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Roger D Yusen; David Weill; Martin Strueber; Edward Garrity; Anna Reed; Andres Pelaez; Timothy P Whelan; Michael Perch; Remzi Bag; Marie Budev; Paul A Corris; Maria M Crespo; Chad Witt; Edward Cantu; Jason D Christie
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Implications of declining donor offers with increased risk of disease transmission on waiting list survival in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Morgan L Cox; Michael S Mulvihill; Ashley Y Choi; Muath Bishawi; Asishana A Osho; John C Haney; Mani Daneshmand; Jacob A Klapper; Cameron R Wolfe; Matthew Hartwig
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Double-lung transplantation can be safely performed using donors with heavy smoking history.

Authors:  Sharven Taghavi; Senthil Jayarajan; Eugene Komaroff; Tetsuya Horai; Stacey Brann; Francis Cordova; Gerard Criner; T Sloane Guy; Yoshiya Toyoda
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Extended recipients but not extended donors are associated with poor outcomes following lung transplantation.

Authors:  Paula Moreno; Antonio Alvarez; Francisco Santos; José Manuel Vaquero; Carlos Baamonde; Javier Redel; Francisco Cerezo; Francisco Javier Algar; Angel Salvatierra
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Continued Successful Evolution of Extended Criteria Donor Lungs for Transplantation.

Authors:  Sakhee Kotecha; Jamie Hobson; Jeremy Fuller; Eldho Paul; Bronwyn J Levvey; Helen Whitford; Miranda Paraskeva; David McGiffin; Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation.

Authors:  A K Israni; D Zaun; N Hadley; J D Rosendale; C Schaffhausen; W McKinney; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.

Authors:  Samantha E Halpern; Alec McConnell; Sarah B Peskoe; Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Ashley Y Choi; Megan L Neely; Scott M Palmer; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.