Literature DB >> 20491544

Homologous recombination conserves DNA sequence integrity throughout the cell cycle in embryonic stem cells.

Lourdes Serrano1, Li Liang, Yiming Chang, Li Deng, Christopher Maulion, Son Nguyen, Jay A Tischfield.   

Abstract

The maintenance of genomic integrity is crucial to embryonic stem cells (ESC) considering the potential for propagating undesirable mutations to the resulting somatic and germ cell lineages. Indeed, mouse ESC (mESC) exhibit a significantly lower mutation frequency compared to differentiated cells. This could be due to more effective elimination of genetically damaged cells via apoptosis, or especially robust, sequence-conserving DNA damage repair mechanisms such as homologous recombination (HR). We used fluorescence microscopy and 3-dimensional image analysis to compare mESC and differentiated cells, with regard to HR-mediated repair of spontaneous and X-ray-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs). Microscopic analysis of repair foci, flow cytometry, and functional assays of the major DSB repair pathways indicate that HR is greater in mESC compared to fibroblasts. Strikingly, HR appears to be the predominant pathway choice to repair induced or spontaneous DNA damage throughout the ESC cycle in contrast to fibroblasts, where it is restricted to replicated chromatin. This suggests that alternative templates, such as homologous chromosomes, are more frequently used to repair DSB in ESC. Relatively frequent HR utilizing homolog chromosome sequences preserves genome integrity in ESC and has distinctive and important genetic consequences to subsequent somatic and germ cell lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20491544      PMCID: PMC3128761          DOI: 10.1089/scd.2010.0159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  59 in total

Review 1.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break".

Authors:  R Rothstein; B Michel; S Gangloff
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination.

Authors:  Marie Frank-Vaillant; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage.

Authors:  E Raderschall; E I Golub; T Haaf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Database of mouse strains carrying targeted mutations in genes affecting biological responses to DNA damage Version 7.

Authors:  Errol C Friedberg; Lisiane B Meira
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-11-09

5.  Somatic Crossing over and Segregation in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  C Stern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Downregulation of multiple stress defense mechanisms during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Gabriele Saretzki; Theresia Walter; Stuart Atkinson; Jõao F Passos; Bettina Bareth; W Nicol Keith; Rebecca Stewart; Stacey Hoare; Miodrag Stojkovic; Lyle Armstrong; Thomas von Zglinicki; Majlinda Lako
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development.

Authors:  Kenji E Orii; Youngsoo Lee; Naomi Kondo; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 9.  Contribution of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint arrest to the maintenance of genomic stability.

Authors:  Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-21

Review 10.  The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the maintenance of genomic stability.

Authors:  K Gudmundsdottir; A Ashworth
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  33 in total

1.  Mismatch and base excision repair proficiency in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy; Li Liang; Li Deng; Jay Tischfield; Sandy Schwemberger; George Babcock; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-02-18

2.  IDH1-R132H acts as a tumor suppressor in glioma via epigenetic up-regulation of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Felipe J Núñez; Flor M Mendez; Padma Kadiyala; Mahmoud S Alghamri; Masha G Savelieff; Maria B Garcia-Fabiani; Santiago Haase; Carl Koschmann; Anda-Alexandra Calinescu; Neha Kamran; Meghna Saxena; Rohin Patel; Stephen Carney; Marissa Z Guo; Marta Edwards; Mats Ljungman; Tingting Qin; Maureen A Sartor; Rebecca Tagett; Sriram Venneti; Jacqueline Brosnan-Cashman; Alan Meeker; Vera Gorbunova; Lili Zhao; Daniel M Kremer; Li Zhang; Costas A Lyssiotis; Lindsey Jones; Cameron J Herting; James L Ross; Dolores Hambardzumyan; Shawn Hervey-Jumper; Maria E Figueroa; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Rad51 regulates cell cycle progression by preserving G2/M transition in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Yoon; Dae-Kwan Kim; Keun Pil Kim; Kyung-Soon Park
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Mutation frequency dynamics in HPRT locus in culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells correspond to their differentiated counterparts.

Authors:  Miriama Krutá; Monika Šeneklová; Jan Raška; Anton Salykin; Lenka Zerzánková; Martin Pešl; Eva Bártová; Michal Franek; Aneta Baumeisterová; Stanislava Košková; Kai J Neelsen; Aleš Hampl; Petr Dvořák; Vladimír Rotrekl
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Mechanisms maintaining genomic integrity in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2011-07-18

6.  The abundance of Rad51 protein in mouse embryonic stem cells is regulated at multiple levels.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy; Resmi Pillai; Li Deng; Jay A Tischfield; Philip Hexley; George F Babcock; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.020

7.  Ionizing radiation is a potent inducer of mitotic recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Natalia G Denissova; Irina V Tereshchenko; Eric Cui; Peter J Stambrook; Changshun Shao; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  DNA end resection is needed for the repair of complex lesions in G1-phase human cells.

Authors:  Nicole B Averbeck; Oliver Ringel; Maren Herrlitz; Burkhard Jakob; Marco Durante; Gisela Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  DNA damage responses in human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Olga Momcilovic; Leah Knobloch; Jamie Fornsaglio; Sandra Varum; Charles Easley; Gerald Schatten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-risk human papillomavirus E6 protein promotes reprogramming of Fanconi anemia patient cells through repression of p53 but does not allow for sustained growth of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Timothy M Chlon; Elizabeth E Hoskins; Christopher N Mayhew; Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp; Stella M Davies; Parinda Mehta; Kasiani C Myers; James M Wells; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.