Literature DB >> 21802432

Ionizing radiation is a potent inducer of mitotic recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Natalia G Denissova1, Irina V Tereshchenko, Eric Cui, Peter J Stambrook, Changshun Shao, Jay A Tischfield.   

Abstract

Maintenance of genomic integrity in embryonic cells is pivotal to proper embryogenesis, organogenesis and to the continuity of species. Cultured mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), a model for early embryonic cells, differ from cultured somatic cells in their capacity to remodel chromatin, in their repertoire of DNA repair enzymes, and in the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints. Using 129XC3HF1 mESCs heterozygous for Aprt, we characterized loss of Aprt heterozygosity after exposure to ionizing radiation. We report here that the frequency of loss of heterozygosity mutants in mESCs can be induced several hundred-fold by exposure to 5-10Gy of X-rays. This induction is 50-100-fold higher than the induction reported for mouse adult or embryonic fibroblasts. The primary mechanism underlying the elevated loss of heterozygosity after irradiation is mitotic recombination, with lesser contributions from deletions and gene conversions that span Aprt. Aprt point mutations and epigenetic inactivation are very rare in mESCs compared to fibroblasts. Mouse ESCs, therefore, are distinctive in their response to ionizing radiation and studies of differentiated cells may underestimate the mutagenic effects of ionizing radiation on ESC or other stem cells. Our findings are important to understanding the biological effects of ionizing radiation on early development and carcinogenesis. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802432      PMCID: PMC3172342          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  50 in total

1.  Radiation specific patterns of loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 17q.

Authors:  C R Giver; A J Grosovsky
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Somatic Crossing over and Segregation in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  C Stern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Tissue-specific deletion and discontinuous loss of heterozygosity are signatures for the mutagenic effects of ionizing radiation in solid tissues.

Authors:  Olga N Ponomareva; Jennifer A Rose; Michael Lasarev; Janet Rasey; Mitchell S Turker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Inherited disorder of purine metabolism. Correlation between central nervous system dysfunction and biochemical defects.

Authors:  F M Rosenbloom; W N Kelley; J Miller; J F Henderson; J E Seegmiller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Heterozygous Aprt mouse model: detection and study of a broad range of autosomal somatic mutations in vivo.

Authors:  H Vrieling; S Wijnhoven; P van Sloun; H Kool; M Giphart-Gassler; A van Zeeland
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  A mutation in mouse rad51 results in an early embryonic lethal that is suppressed by a mutation in p53.

Authors:  D S Lim; P Hasty
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase-deficient mice develop 2,8-dihydroxyadenine nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  S J Engle; M G Stockelman; J Chen; G Boivin; M N Yum; P M Davies; M Y Ying; A Sahota; H A Simmonds; P J Stambrook; J A Tischfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Chromosome markers in Mus musculus: strain differences in C-banding.

Authors:  V G Dev; D A Miller; O J Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Cell-type-specific consequences of nucleotide excision repair deficiencies: Embryonic stem cells versus fibroblasts.

Authors:  Harm de Waard; Edwin Sonneveld; Jan de Wit; Rebecca Esveldt-van Lange; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Harry Vrieling; Gijsbertus T J van der Horst
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-07-26
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Defining a genotoxic profile with mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Tae Moon Kim; Vivienne I Rebel; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2013-03

2.  Radiation Response of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Christine E Hellweg; Vaibhav Shinde; Sureshkumar Perumal Srinivasan; Margit Henry; Tamara Rotshteyn; Christa Baumstark-Khan; Claudia Schmitz; Sebastian Feles; Luis F Spitta; Ruth Hemmersbach; Jürgen Hescheler; Agapios Sachinidis
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Ionizing Radiation Impacts on Cardiac Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Alexander Helm; Onetsine Arrizabalaga; Diana Pignalosa; Insa S Schroeder; Marco Durante; Sylvia Ritter
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.272

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.