Literature DB >> 20490945

Does femoral strain distribution coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures? An experimental finite element study.

Janne E M Koivumäki1, Jérôme Thevenot, Pasi Pulkkinen, Jukka A Salmi, Volker Kuhn, Eva-Maria Lochmüller, Thomas M Link, Felix Eckstein, Timo Jämsä.   

Abstract

The objective of this experimental finite element (FE) study is to test the hypothesis that strain distributions coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures during loading conditions simulating a sideways fall, and that the cervical versus trochanteric principal strain ratio predicts different fracture patterns. Cadaver femora (female, 83 +/- 9 years) were CT scanned and mechanically tested simulating a fall. Thirteen cervical and 13 trochanteric fracture cases were selected for FE analysis. Principal strain distributions were analysed, and strain ratio epsilon(C)/epsilon(T) for strain patterns over the cervical and trochanteric regions was computed. The ratio epsilon(C)/epsilon(T) in the femora with cervical fractures (mean +/- SD 1.103 +/- 0.127) differed from that in trochanteric fractures (0.925 +/- 0.137) (p = 0.001). The significant difference in the strain ratio between fracture types remained after accounting for femoral neck and trochanteric BMD (p = 0.014), showing that it is independent of BMD. Area under the ROC curve was 0.858 in the discrimination of fracture types. The model predicted the experimental fracture type correctly in 22 of 26 cases. The cervical versus trochanteric region principal strain ratio differed significantly between femora with experimental cervical versus trochanteric fractures, and 85% agreement was achieved for the occurrence of hip fracture types using a simple FE model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490945     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0622-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  33 in total

1.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  An anatomical subject-specific FE-model for hip fracture load prediction.

Authors:  L Duchemin; D Mitton; E Jolivet; V Bousson; J D Laredo; W Skalli
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi; K A Jones; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega; T A Einhorn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Parkkari; P Kannus; M Palvanen; A Natri; J Vainio; H Aho; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women. Results from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  A M Schott; D Hans; F Duboeuf; P Dargent-Molina; T Hajri; G Bréart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: a preliminary study on patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Masahiko Bessho; Isao Ohnishi; Hiroshi Okazaki; Wakyo Sato; Hisato Kominami; Shigeru Matsunaga; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  J S Gregory; D Testi; A Stewart; P E Undrill; D M Reid; R M Aspden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength.

Authors:  Gerold Holzer; Gobert von Skrbensky; Lukas A Holzer; Wolfgang Pichl
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; E R Myers; D P Kiel; R A Parker; W C Hayes; N M Resnick
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trabecular Plate Loss and Deteriorating Elastic Modulus of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Bin Zhou; Ian Parkinson; C David L Thomas; John G Clement; Nick Fazzalari; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.567

2.  Sensitivity of patient-specific vertebral finite element model from low dose imaging to material properties and loading conditions.

Authors:  Christophe Travert; Erwan Jolivet; Emilie Sapin-de Brosses; David Mitton; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A quasi-brittle continuum damage finite element model of the human proximal femur based on element deletion.

Authors:  Ridha Hambli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Three-dimensional mapping of cortical porosity and thickness along the superolateral femoral neck in older women.

Authors:  Aleksandar Cirovic; Ana Cirovic; Danica Djukic; Danijela Djonic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Slobodan Nikolic; Marija Djuric; Petar Milovanovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.