Literature DB >> 20490458

Monitoring surgical performance: an application of industrial quality process control to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

David J Biau1, Philippe Landreau, Nicolas Graveleau, Nicolas Gravelau.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Quality control is receiving increasing attention from surgeons as a key to meeting the needs of patients and the requirements of health care authorities. The objective of the study was to evaluate a continuous monitoring program for surgical performance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We measured the differential anterior knee laxity immediately after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by two experienced surgeons. Surgical technique including the choice of ancillary devices and implant material was at the surgeon's discretion. The target was an immediate postoperative differential knee laxity at 20 degrees of knee flexion of -1.5 mm. The cumulative summation test (CUSUM) was used to detect inadequate performance. Seventy-nine consecutive patients were included in the study. Median postoperative differential knee laxity at 20 degrees flexion was -2 mm (interquartile range -4 to 0 mm; SD = 2.3). The CUSUM test at 20 degrees knee flexion emitted an alarm at the 12th procedure, indicating that performance was inadequate with a tendency for laxity to be above the target of -1.5 mm. Two alarms were emitted after the 28th procedure, indicating that laxity tended to be below the target. Monitoring of immediate postoperative differential anterior knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is feasible and can provide useful information on actual surgeon performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: continuous monitoring of the quality of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may help surgeons to detect deviations from optimal performance when new surgical techniques and innovative fixation devices are introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490458     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1157-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  17 in total

1.  Continuous monitoring of the performance of hip prostheses.

Authors:  S L Hardoon; J D Lewsey; P J Gregg; B C Reeves; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

2.  The effects of different tensioning strategies on knee laxity and graft tension after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierluigi Cuomo; Krishna Reddi Boddu Siva Rama; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Monitoring surgical performance: an application to total hip replacement.

Authors:  David J Biau; Alexandre Milet; Fabrice Thévenin; Philippe Anract; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Atsushi Kanaya; Mitsuo Ochi; Masataka Deie; Nobuo Adachi; Makoto Nishimori; Atsuo Nakamae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM.

Authors:  D J Biau; S M Williams; M M Schlup; R S Nizard; R Porcher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery.

Authors:  Håkan Jonsson; Katrine Riklund-Ahlström; Jonas Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-10

Review 8.  Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  Donald C Fithian; Liz W Paxton; David H Goltz
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 9.  Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: influence of femoral tunnel orientation in knee laxity analysed with a navigation system - an in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Danilo Bruni; Sandra Martelli; Naoaki Imakiire; Maurilio Marcacci; Alessandro Russo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Monitoring the one year postoperative infection rate after primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  David J Biau; Philippe Leclerc; Simon Marmor; Valerie Zeller; Wilfrid Graff; Luc Lhotellier; Philippe Leonard; Patrick Mamoudy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Optimal measurement of clinical rotational test for evaluating anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Daisuke Araki; Seiji Kubo; Motoi Yamaguchi; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Marco Tinius; Pierre Hepp; Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.