Literature DB >> 16720761

Continuous monitoring of the performance of hip prostheses.

S L Hardoon1, J D Lewsey, P J Gregg, B C Reeves, J H P van der Meulen.   

Abstract

New brands of joint prosthesis are released for general implantation with limited evidence of their long-term performance in patients. The CUSUM continuous monitoring method is a statistical testing procedure which could be used to provide prospective evaluation of brands as soon as implantation in patients begins and give early warning of poor performance. We describe the CUSUM and illustrate the potential value of this monitoring tool by applying it retrospectively to the 3M Capital Hip experience. The results show that if the clinical data and methodology had been available, the CUSUM would have given an alert to the underperformance of this prosthesis almost four years before the issue of a Hazard Notice by the Medical Devices Agency. This indicates that the CUSUM can be a valuable tool in monitoring joint prostheses, subject to timely and complete collection of data. Regional or national joint registries provide an opportunity for future centralised, continuous monitoring of all hip and knee prostheses using these techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720761     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  9 in total

1.  Monitoring surgical performance: an application of industrial quality process control to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David J Biau; Philippe Landreau; Nicolas Graveleau; Nicolas Gravelau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [What can we learn in future from the data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) in comparison to other registries?].

Authors:  V Jansson; A Steinbrück; J Hassenpflug
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  High incidence of migration with poor initial fixation of the Accolade stem.

Authors:  Craig A White; Sasha Carsen; Kevin Rasuli; Robert J Feibel; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.

Authors:  Patrick L Ergina; Jonathan A Cook; Jane M Blazeby; Isabelle Boutron; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Barnaby C Reeves; Christoph M Seiler; Douglas G Altman; Jeffrey K Aronson; Jeffrey S Barkun; W Bruce Campbell; Jonathan A Cook; Liane S Feldman; David R Flum; Paul Glasziou; Guy J Maddern; John C Marshall; Peter McCulloch; Jon Nicholl; Steven M Strasberg; Jonathan L Meakins; Deborah Ashby; Nick Black; John Bunker; Martin Burton; Marion Campbell; Kalipso Chalkidou; Iain Chalmers; Marc de Leval; Jon Deeks; Adrian Grant; Muir Gray; Roger Greenhalgh; Milos Jenicek; Sean Kehoe; Richard Lilford; Peter Littlejohns; Yoon Loke; Rajan Madhock; Kim McPherson; Peter Rothwell; Bill Summerskill; David Taggart; Parris Tekkis; Matthew Thompson; Tom Treasure; Ulrich Trohler; Jan Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Long-term (20- to 25-year) results of an uncemented tapered titanium femoral component and factors affecting survivorship.

Authors:  Marcus R Streit; Moritz M Innmann; Christian Merle; Thomas Bruckner; Peter R Aldinger; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate- and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rémy S Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Surgical skills training for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukiharu Hasegawa; Takafumi Amano
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.131

8.  Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller; David C Davidson; Philip Ryan; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006.

Authors:  Nokuthaba Sibanda; Lynn P Copley; Jim D Lewsey; Mick Borroff; Paul Gregg; Alex J MacGregor; Martin Pickford; Martyn Porter; Keith Tucker; Jan H van der Meulen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.