Literature DB >> 2048774

The polarization impedance of common electrode metals operated at low current density.

T Ragheb1, L A Geddes.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the polarization impedance (resistance and capacitance) of several common metal/0.9% saline interfaces operated at low-current density and to thereby provide a useful reference for those wishing to calculate the impedance of such electrodes. The series-equivalent resistance (R) and capacitive reactance (Xc) of stainless steel, platinum, silver, MP35N, palladium, aluminum, rhodium and copper electrodes, all having a surface areas S = 0.005 cm2 and all in contact with 0.9% saline, were measured as a function of frequency (100 Hz to 20 kHz) at low-current density (0.025 mA/cm2). For all the metals tested, both R and Xc decreased with increasing frequency and the relationships were linear on a log-log plot. That is, R and Xc exhibited power-law behavior (R = A/f alpha and Xc = B/f beta). However, it was not generally true that A = B and alpha = beta = 0.5 as stated in the Warburg low-current density model. Furthermore, the Fricke constant phase model in which alpha = beta and phi = 0.5 pi beta was found not to be applicable in general. In particular, the constraint that alpha = beta was a good approximation for most of the metals tested in this study, but the constraint that phi = 0.5 pi beta did not hold in general. Although the Warburg low-current density model provides a useful conceptual tool, it is not the most accurate representation of the electrode-electrolyte interface. The Fricke constant phase model is a better representation of electrode behavior, but it also may not be valid in general. We have found that a better representation is provided by the general power-law model R = A/f alpha and Xc = B/f beta, where A, B, alpha, and beta depend on the species of both the metal and electrolyte and A and B depend, in addition, on electrode area. Using this model and the data presented in this study, the impedance of an electrode-electrolyte interface operated at low-current density may be calculated as formula see text where S is the surface area of the electrode in cm2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2048774     DOI: 10.1007/bf02368466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  4 in total

1.  Electrical properties of metallic electrodes.

Authors:  T Ragheb; L A Geddes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The impedance of stainless-steel electrodes.

Authors:  L A Geddes; C P Da Costa; G Wise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1971-09

3.  A unified approach to represent metal electrode polarization.

Authors:  H H Sun; B Onaral
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Linear and nonlinear properties of platinum electrode polarisation. Part 1: frequency dependence at very low frequencies.

Authors:  B Onaral; H P Schwan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.602

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  The impedance of a spherical monopolar electrode.

Authors:  T Ragheb; S Riegle; L A Geddes; V Amin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Bioimpedance analysis: a guide to simple design and implementation.

Authors:  Kevin R Aroom; Matthew T Harting; Charles S Cox; Ravi S Radharkrishnan; Carter Smith; Brijesh S Gill
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  An electric impedance based microelectromechanical system flow sensor for ionic solutions.

Authors:  H Edward Ayliffe; Rd Rabbitt
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Detection of spine structures with Bioimpedance Probe (BIP) Needle in clinical lumbar punctures.

Authors:  Sanna Halonen; Kari Annala; Juho Kari; Samuli Jokinen; Aki Lumme; Kai Kronström; Arvi Yli-Hankala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Direct current electrocorticography for clinical neuromonitoring of spreading depolarizations.

Authors:  Jed A Hartings; Chunyan Li; Jason M Hinzman; C William Shuttleworth; Griffin L Ernst; Jens P Dreier; J Adam Wilson; Norberto Andaluz; Brandon Foreman; Andrew P Carlson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Evaluating Major Electrode Types for Idle Biological Signal Measurements for Modern Medical Technology.

Authors:  Anas Albulbul
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-24

7.  Model-guided control of hippocampal discharges by local direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Julien Modolo; Fanny Recher; Gabriel Dieuset; Arnaud Biraben; Pascal Benquet; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Applications of Bioimpedance Measurement Techniques in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  M Amini; J Hisdal; H Kalvøy
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2018-12-31

9.  Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes.

Authors:  Tony T C Man; Yolanda W Y Yip; Frederick K F Cheung; Wing Sze Lee; Chi Pui Pang; Mårten Erik Brelén
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.