Literature DB >> 25479739

The coordinate system for force control.

Devjani J Saha1, Xiao Hu, Eric Perreault, Wendy Murray, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to establish the coordinate frame for force control by observing how parameters of force that are not explicitly specified by a motor task vary across the workspace. We asked subjects to apply a force of a specific magnitude with their hand. Subjects could complete the task by applying forces in any direction of their choice in the transverse plane. They were tested with the arm in seven different configurations. To estimate whether contact forces are represented in extrinsic or intrinsic coordinates, we applied the parallel transport method of differential geometry to the net joint torques applied during the task. This approach allowed us to compare the force variability observed at different arm configurations with the force variability that would be expected if the control system were applying an invariant pattern of joint torques at the tested configurations. The results indicate that for the majority of the subjects, the predominant pattern was consistent with an invariant representation in joint coordinates. However, two out of eleven subjects also demonstrated a preference for extrinsic representation. These findings suggest that the central nervous system can represent contact forces in both coordinate frames, with a prevalence toward intrinsic representations.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25479739     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4165-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Motor memory and local minimization of error and effort, not global optimization, determine motor behavior.

Authors:  G Ganesh; M Haruno; M Kawato; E Burdet
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Control of grip force when tilting objects: effect of curvature of grasped surfaces and applied tangential torque.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; P Jenmalm; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement.

Authors:  E V Evarts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Relating motor cortex spike trains to measures of motor performance.

Authors:  D R Humphrey
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres.

Authors:  A M Gordon; A F Huxley; F J Julian
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Contraction duration affects metabolic energy cost and fatigue in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M C Hogan; E Ingham; S S Kurdak
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-03

8.  Motor memory is encoded as a gain-field combination of intrinsic and extrinsic action representations.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Daniel Z Press; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Friction, not texture, dictates grip forces used during object manipulation.

Authors:  G Cadoret; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.