Literature DB >> 20479146

Identification of selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for dairy production.

Alessandra Stella1, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan, Barbara Lazzari, Paul Boettcher.   

Abstract

The genomics revolution has spurred the undertaking of HapMap studies of numerous species, allowing for population genomics to increase the understanding of how selection has created genetic differences between subspecies populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) develop an approach to detect signatures of selection in subsets of phenotypically similar breeds of livestock by comparing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) diversity between the subset and a larger population, (2) verify this method in breeds selected for simply inherited traits, and (3) apply this method to the dairy breeds in the International Bovine HapMap (IBHM) study. The data consisted of genotypes for 32,689 SNPs of 497 animals from 19 breeds. For a given subset of breeds, the test statistic was the parametric composite log likelihood (CLL) of the differences in allelic frequencies between the subset and the IBHM for a sliding window of SNPs. The null distribution was obtained by calculating CLL for 50,000 random subsets (per chromosome) of individuals. The validity of this approach was confirmed by obtaining extremely large CLLs at the sites of causative variation for polled (BTA1) and black-coat-color (BTA18) phenotypes. Across the 30 bovine chromosomes, 699 putative selection signatures were detected. The largest CLL was on BTA6 and corresponded to KIT, which is responsible for the piebald phenotype present in four of the five dairy breeds. Potassium channel-related genes were at the site of the largest CLL on three chromosomes (BTA14, -16, and -25) whereas integrins (BTA18 and -19) and serine/arginine rich splicing factors (BTA20 and -23) each had the largest CLL on two chromosomes. On the basis of the results of this study, the application of population genomics to farm animals seems quite promising. Comparisons between breed groups have the potential to identify genomic regions influencing complex traits with no need for complex equipment and the collection of extensive phenotypic records and can contribute to the identification of candidate genes and to the understanding of the biological mechanisms controlling complex traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20479146      PMCID: PMC2927769          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.116111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Scott Williamson; Yuseob Kim; Melissa J Hubisz; Andrew G Clark; Carlos Bustamante
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Measures of human population structure show heterogeneity among genomic regions.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir; Lon R Cardon; Amy D Anderson; Dahlia M Nielsen; William G Hill
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Fine mapping of the polled locus to a 1-Mb region on bovine chromosome 1q12.

Authors:  Cord Drögemüller; Anne Wöhlke; Stefanie Mömke; Ottmar Distl
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Temporal gene expression profiling of liver from periparturient dairy cows reveals complex adaptive mechanisms in hepatic function.

Authors:  Juan J Loor; Heather M Dann; Robin E Everts; Rosane Oliveira; Cheryl A Green; Nicole A Janovick Guretzky; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas; Harris A Lewin; James K Drackley
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The "spotted" locus maps to bovine chromosome 6 in a Hereford-Cross population.

Authors:  M D Grosz; M D MacNeil
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  The polled locus maps to BTA1 in a Bos indicus x Bos taurus cross.

Authors:  R A Brenneman; S K Davis; J O Sanders; B M Burns; T C Wheeler; J W Turner; J F Taylor
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination.

Authors:  H Klungland; D I Våge; L Gomez-Raya; S Adalsteinsson; S Lien
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 10.  Population genetic analysis of ascertained SNP data.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.639

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Deciphering the genetic basis of animal domestication.

Authors:  Pamela Wiener; Samantha Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genomic signatures reveal new evidences for selection of important traits in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Lingyang Xu; Derek M Bickhart; John B Cole; Steven G Schroeder; Jiuzhou Song; Curtis P Van Tassell; Tad S Sonstegard; George E Liu
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  The application of genome-wide SNP genotyping methods in studies on livestock genomes.

Authors:  Artur Gurgul; Ewelina Semik; Klaudia Pawlina; Tomasz Szmatoła; Igor Jasielczuk; Monika Bugno-Poniewierska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exploring evidence of positive selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for different traits.

Authors:  Mengistie Taye; Wonseok Lee; Soomin Jeon; Joon Yoon; Tadelle Dessie; Olivier Hanotte; Okeyo Ally Mwai; Stephen Kemp; Seoae Cho; Sung Jong Oh; Hak-Kyo Lee; Heebal Kim
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism within the Interferon Gamma Receptor 2 Gene Perfectly Coincides with Polledness in Holstein Cattle.

Authors:  Sabrina Glatzer; Nina Johanna Merten; Claudia Dierks; Anne Wöhlke; Ute Philipp; Ottmar Distl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Information content in genome-wide scans: concordance between patterns of genetic differentiation and linkage mapping associations.

Authors:  Pamela Wiener; Mohammad A Edriss; John L Williams; David Waddington; Andrew Law; John A Woolliams; Beatriz Gutiérrez-Gil
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Genome-wide analysis of the world's sheep breeds reveals high levels of historic mixture and strong recent selection.

Authors:  James W Kijas; Johannes A Lenstra; Ben Hayes; Simon Boitard; Laercio R Porto Neto; Magali San Cristobal; Bertrand Servin; Russell McCulloch; Vicki Whan; Kimberly Gietzen; Samuel Paiva; William Barendse; Elena Ciani; Herman Raadsma; John McEwan; Brian Dalrymple
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  A quasi-exclusive European ancestry in the Senepol tropical cattle breed highlights the importance of the slick locus in tropical adaptation.

Authors:  Laurence Flori; Mary Isabel Gonzatti; Sophie Thevenon; Isabelle Chantal; Joar Pinto; David Berthier; Pedro M Aso; Mathieu Gautier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic scan of selective sweeps in thin and fat tail sheep breeds for identifying of candidate regions associated with fat deposition.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Moradi; Ardeshir Nejati-Javaremi; Mohammad Moradi-Shahrbabak; Ken G Dodds; John C McEwan
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Detecting loci under recent positive selection in dairy and beef cattle by combining different genome-wide scan methods.

Authors:  Yuri Tani Utsunomiya; Ana Maria Pérez O'Brien; Tad Stewart Sonstegard; Curtis Paul Van Tassell; Adriana Santana do Carmo; Gábor Mészáros; Johann Sölkner; José Fernando Garcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.