Literature DB >> 20478559

Precision of nanoindentation protocols for measurement of viscoelasticity in cortical and trabecular bone.

Hanna Isaksson1, Shijo Nagao, Marta Małkiewicz, Petro Julkunen, Roman Nowak, Jukka S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

Nanoindentation has recently gained attention as a characterization technique for mechanical properties of biological tissues, such as bone, on the sub-micron level. However, optimal methods to characterize viscoelastic properties of bones are yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the time-dependent viscoelastic properties of bone tissue obtained with different nanoindentation methods. Bovine cortical and trabecular bone samples (n=8) from the distal femur and proximal tibia were dehydrated, embedded and polished. The material properties determined using nanoindentation were hardness and reduced modulus, as well as time-dependent parameters based on creep, loading-rate, dissipated energy and semi-dynamic testing under load control. Each loading protocol was repeated 160 times and the reproducibility was assessed based on the coefficient of variation (CV). Additionally, three well-characterized polymers were tested and CV values were calculated for reference. The employed methods were able to characterize time-dependent viscoelastic properties of bone. However, their reproducibility varied highly (CV 9-40%). The creep constant increased with increasing dwell time. The reproducibility was best with a 30s creep period (CV 18%). The dissipated energy was stable after three repeated load cycles, and the reproducibility improved with each cycle (CV 23%). The viscoelastic properties determined with semi-dynamic test increased with increase in frequency. These measurements were most reproducible at high frequencies (CV 9-10%). Our results indicate that several methods are feasible for the determination of viscoelastic properties of bone material. The high frequency semi-dynamic test showed the highest precision within the tested nanoindentation protocols. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20478559     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of regenerating long bone by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Takuya Ishimoto; Takayoshi Nakano; Masaya Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Tabata
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review.

Authors:  Ramin Oftadeh; Miguel Perez-Viloria; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Ashkan Vaziri; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Mechanical Heterogeneity in the Bone Microenvironment as Characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Authors:  Xinyue Chen; Russell Hughes; Nic Mullin; Rhoda J Hawkins; Ingunn Holen; Nicola J Brown; Jamie K Hobbs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Principal trabecular structural orientation predicted by quantitative ultrasound is strongly correlated with μFEA determined anisotropic apparent stiffness.

Authors:  Liangjun Lin; Han Yuen Oon; Wei Lin; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-01-14

5.  Viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone tissue depend on gender and elastic modulus.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Timothy C Ovaert; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Effect of estrogen deficiency on regional variation of a viscoelastic tissue property of bone.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Sarandeep S Huja; Anand Navalgund; Andrew D'Atri; BoonChing Tee; Sarah Reeder; Hye Ri Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The effect of holding time on nanoindentation measurements of creep in bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Tyler A Baker; Timothy C Ovaert; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Indentation experiments and simulation of ovine bone using a viscoelastic-plastic damage model.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Ziheng Wu; Simon Turner; Jennifer MacLeay; Glen L Niebur; Timothy C Ovaert
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.089

9.  Direct comparison of nanoindentation and macroscopic measurements of bone viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Tara N Shepherd; Jingzhou Zhang; Timothy C Ovaert; Ryan K Roeder; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-07-18

10.  Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Hyun-Jung Kwon; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Erin Kosel; Damian J Lee; Jung-Suk Han; Hye-Lee Kim; Dae-Joon Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.