Literature DB >> 22052806

Viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone tissue depend on gender and elastic modulus.

Ziheng Wu1, Timothy C Ovaert, Glen L Niebur.   

Abstract

Bone exhibits rate-dependent failure behavior, suggesting that viscoelasticity is a factor in the damage and fracture of bone. Microdamage initiates at scales below the macroscopic porosity in bone, and, as such, is affected by the intrinsic viscoelasticity of the bone tissue. The viscoelasticity of the bone tissue can be measured by nanoindentation and recording the creep behavior at constant load. The viscoelastic properties have been used to assess differences in tissue behavior with respect to fracture healing, aging, and mouse strains. In this study, we compared the viscoelastic behavior of human cortical bone between genders by using nanoindentation at a fixed load of 10 mN to measure the creep time constant. Bones from females had a significantly greater time constant, indicating slower creep and relaxation, than bones from males. The creep time constants decreased with increasing tissue modulus. The mineralization, collagen content, and collagen cross-link density, which were bulk measurements, were analyzed to determine if the differences in viscoelastic behavior were explained by compositional differences in the bone. However, none of the parameters differed between genders, nor were they correlated to the viscoelastic time constant. As such, the difference must depend on other matrix proteins that we did not assess or differences in the microstructural organization. This is one of the only intrinsic bone material properties that has been found to differ between males and females, and it may be important for assessing differences in fracture risk, since crack propagation is generally sensitive to viscoelastic properties.
Copyright © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22052806      PMCID: PMC3288480          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  39 in total

1.  Viscoelastic dissipation in compact bone: implications for stress-induced fluid flow in bone.

Authors:  E Garner; R Lakes; T Lee; C Swan; R Brand
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Determinants of ovine compact bone viscoelastic properties: effects of architecture, mineralization, and remodeling.

Authors:  C M Les; C A Spence; J L Vance; G T Christopherson; B Patel; A S Turner; G W Divine; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Differences in the degree of bone tissue mineralization account for little of the differences in tissue elastic properties.

Authors:  Roger M D Zebaze; Anthony C Jones; Marcus G Pandy; Mark A Knackstedt; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The fracture mechanics of fatigue crack propagation in compact bone.

Authors:  T M Wright; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1976-07

5.  Cement line motion in bone.

Authors:  R Lakes; S Saha
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.

Authors:  D R Carter; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Stress relaxation in native and EDTA-treated bone as a function of mineral content.

Authors:  N Sasaki; M Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone--I. Torsional and biaxial studies.

Authors:  R S Lakes; J L Katz; S S Sternstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone--II. Relaxation mechanisms.

Authors:  R S Lakes; J L Katz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Strain rate dependence of the mechanical properties of reindeer antler and the cumulative damage model of bone fracture.

Authors:  J D Currey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The relationship of whole human vertebral body creep to geometric, microstructural, and material properties.

Authors:  Daniel Oravec; Woong Kim; Michael J Flynn; Yener N Yeni
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Effect of estrogen deficiency on regional variation of a viscoelastic tissue property of bone.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Sarandeep S Huja; Anand Navalgund; Andrew D'Atri; BoonChing Tee; Sarah Reeder; Hye Ri Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of alveolar cleft bone graft on the maxillofacial biomechanical stabilities of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Tao Tian; Han-Yao Huang; Wei Wang; Bing Shi; Qian Zheng; Cheng-Hao Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.903

6.  Techniques for bone assessment and characterization: porcine hard palate case study.

Authors:  A Cañas-Gutiérrez; D Arboleda-Toro; T Monsalve-Vargas; C Castro-Herazo; J M Meza-Meza
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-04

7.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Mathilde Granke; Robert C Singleton; George M Pharr
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  The role of subchondral bone, and its histomorphology, on the dynamic viscoelasticity of cartilage, bone and osteochondral cores.

Authors:  N L A Fell; B M Lawless; S C Cox; M E Cooke; N M Eisenstein; D E T Shepherd; D M Espino
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 10.  Embracing Mechanobiology in Next Generation Organ-On-A-Chip Models of Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Ellen E Slay; Fiona C Meldrum; Virginia Pensabene; Mahetab H Amer
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-09-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.