Literature DB >> 20477415

Early detection of ovarian cancer.

Partha M Das1, Robert C Bast.   

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is associated with an overall mortality of 75%, but can be cured in up to 90% of cases if diagnosed while still limited to the ovaries. Given the low prevalence of ovarian cancer in the general population, an effective screening strategy must not only have a high sensitivity for early-stage disease (>75%), but must also have a very high specificity (99.6%) to prompt no more than ten operations for each case of ovarian cancer diagnosed (positive predictive value [PPV] of 10%). Attempts to develop an effective screening strategy for ovarian cancer have utilized ultrasonography and serum tumor markers. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) and the serum marker CA125 have received the most attention to date. Used individually on a single occasion, neither of these approaches provides an adequate PPV and the cost of annual TVS is significant. Recent clinical trials have focused on serial monitoring of CA125 and the sequential use of a rising CA125 to prompt TVS in a limited number of women screened. Sequential monitoring of CA125 has significantly improved specificity of the assay in women over 50 years of age. The limited sensitivity of CA125 has, however, prompted a search for multiple serum markers that, in combination, would detect more than 90% of early-stage disease. Recent developments in genomic and proteomic research have identified a number of candidate biomarkers. Platforms have been developed that can assay more than 50 analytes in a few hundred microliters of serum. Panels of biomarkers have been discovered with high sensitivity and specificity for early-stage disease, but these require prospective validation. Several biomarkers have also been detected in urine, raising the possibility of a less expensive, more convenient screening test. Imaging techniques have been improved and mathematical methods developed that, in aggregate, promise to provide an effective screening strategy for ovarian cancer. In this review, we will assess the current status and describe future directions in ovarian cancer screening.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20477415      PMCID: PMC2930760          DOI: 10.2217/17520363.2.3.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomark Med        ISSN: 1752-0363            Impact factor:   2.851


  89 in total

1.  Quantifying the potential benefit of CA 125 screening for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S J Skates; D E Singer
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Elevation of serum CA 125 prior to diagnosis of an epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  R C Bast; F P Siegal; C Runowicz; T L Klug; V R Zurawski; D Schonholz; C J Cohen; R C Knapp
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Preoperative plasma osteopontin level as a biomarker complementary to carbohydrate antigen 125 in predicting ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nakae; Ichiro Iwamoto; Toshinori Fujino; Yoshiyasu Maehata; Shin-ichi Togami; Mitsuhiro Yoshinaga; Tsutomu Douchi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Proteomic-based discovery and characterization of glycosylated eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and COOH-terminal osteopontin fragments for ovarian cancer in urine.

Authors:  Bin Ye; Steven Skates; Samuel C Mok; Nora K Horick; Helene F Rosenberg; Allison Vitonis; Dale Edwards; Patrick Sluss; Won K Han; Ross S Berkowitz; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Methylation of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 gene and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Wiley; D Katsaros; S Fracchioli; H Yu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Human kallikrein 10: a novel tumor marker for ovarian carcinoma?

Authors:  L Y Luo; P Bunting; A Scorilas; E P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 7.  The heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancers: reconciling old and new paradigms.

Authors:  Honami Naora
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.600

8.  Potential markers that complement expression of CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Daniel G Rosen; Lin Wang; J Neeley Atkinson; Yinhua Yu; Karen H Lu; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Ingegerd Hellstrom; Samuel C Mok; Jinsong Liu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Characterization of an ovarian cancer activating factor in ascites from ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Y Xu; D C Gaudette; J D Boynton; A Frankel; X J Fang; A Sharma; J Hurteau; G Casey; A Goodbody; A Mellors
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Toward an optimal algorithm for ovarian cancer screening with longitudinal tumor markers.

Authors:  S J Skates; F J Xu; Y H Yu; K Sjövall; N Einhorn; Y Chang; R C Bast; R C Knapp
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  34 in total

1.  A microfluidic platform with digital readout and ultra-low detection limit for quantitative point-of-care diagnostics.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jie Xuan; Yujun Song; Ping Wang; Lidong Qin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Targeted metabolomic profiling of low and high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer tissues: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Ali Yilmaz; Praveen Kumar; Onur Turkoglu; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Barry Rosen; Ray O Bahado-Singh; Stewart F Graham
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 3.  Nanotechnology and Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Tracing New Landscapes.

Authors:  Bruna Corradetti; Simone Pisano; Robert Steven Conlan; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Highly sensitive detection of HER2 extracellular domain in the serum of breast cancer patients by piezoelectric microcantilevers.

Authors:  LiNa Loo; Joseph A Capobianco; Wei Wu; Xiaotong Gao; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Kambiz Pourrezaei; Matthew K Robinson; Gregory P Adams
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Novel Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Denise R Nebgen; Karen H Lu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  A framework for evaluating biomarkers for early detection: validation of biomarker panels for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Claire S Zhu; Paul F Pinsky; Daniel W Cramer; David F Ransohoff; Patricia Hartge; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Nicole Urban; Gil Mor; Robert C Bast; Lee E Moore; Anna E Lokshin; Martin W McIntosh; Steven J Skates; Allison Vitonis; Zhen Zhang; David C Ward; James T Symanowski; Aleksey Lomakin; Eric T Fung; Patrick M Sluss; Nathalie Scholler; Karen H Lu; Adele M Marrangoni; Christos Patriotis; Sudhir Srivastava; Saundra S Buys; Christine D Berg
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

Review 7.  The emerging role of HE4 in the evaluation of epithelial ovarian and endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Archana R Simmons; Keith Baggerly; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Mathematical model identifies blood biomarker-based early cancer detection strategies and limitations.

Authors:  Sharon S Hori; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Nano-bio-chips for high performance multiplexed protein detection: determinations of cancer biomarkers in serum and saliva using quantum dot bioconjugate labels.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Archana Raamanathan; Nicolaos Christodoulides; Pierre N Floriano; Amanda A Pollard; Glennon W Simmons; Jorge Wong; Carole Gage; Wieslaw B Furmaga; Spencer W Redding; John T McDevitt
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 10.618

10.  HE4 protein and SMRP: Potential novel biomarkers in ovarian cancer detection.

Authors:  Anna Fritz-Rdzanek; Wojciech Grzybowski; Jarosław Beta; Andrzej Durczyński; Artur Jakimiuk
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.