Literature DB >> 20473782

Spatially adaptive active contours: a semi-automatic tumor segmentation framework.

Cristina Farmaki1, Konstantinos Marias, Vangelis Sakkalis, Norbert Graf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumor segmentation constitutes a crucial step in simulating cancer growth and response to therapy. Incorporation of imaging data individualizes the simulation and assists clinical correlation with the predicted outcome. We adapted snakes to improve tumor segmentation including difficult cases with inherently inhomogeneous structure and poorly defined margins.
METHODS: Snakes are flexible curves, based on the parameter-controlled deformation of an initial user-defined contour toward the boundary of the desired object, through the minimization of a suitable energy function. Although parameter-adjustment can yield fairly good results in homogeneous regions, traditional snakes often fail to provide an accurate segmentation result when both rigid and very elastic behavior is needed simultaneously to delineate the true outline of the tumor. We developed and tested a spatially adaptive active contour technique by introducing local snake bending, to improve traditional snakes performance for segmenting tumors. The key point of our method is the use of adaptable snake parameters, instead of constant ones, to adjust the bending of the curve according to the local edge characteristics. Our algorithm discriminates image regions according to underlying image features, such as gradient magnitude and corner strength. More specifically, it assigns each region a different "localized" set of parameters, one corresponding to a very flexible snake, and the other corresponding to a very rigid one, according to the local image characteristics.
RESULTS: Qualitative results on more than 150 real MR images, as well as quantitative validation based on agreement with an expert clinician's annotations of the true tumor boundaries, demonstrate our approach is highly efficient compared to traditional active contours and region growing. Due to the use of adaptable parameters in the snake evolution process, our approach outperforms the other two methods, and consistently follows an expert's annotations. Statistical tests indicated significant difference between the results produced by our approach and two other algorithms traditional snakes and region growing, while multiple comparison showed that our method consistently outperformed those algorithms, with an average overlap of 89%, over the entire data set, while traditional snakes were at 82.5% and region growing at 59.2%. Furthermore, we performed several tests that demonstrate our method's stability to different initial contours, as well as, to lower resolution images.
CONCLUSION: Our adaptive snake algorithm can spatially adapt to diverse image characteristics, producing outlines that mimic the true tumor boundaries. Results in MR datasets are very close to an expert clinician's intuition about the tumor boundaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473782     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0477-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  12 in total

1.  A spatiotemporal, patient individualized simulation model of solid tumor response to chemotherapy in vivo: the paradigm of glioblastoma multiforme treated by temozolomide.

Authors:  Georgios S Stamatakos; Vassilis P Antipas; Nikolaos K Uzunoglu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Novel multistage three-dimensional medical image segmentation: methodology and validation.

Authors:  Lixu Gu; Jianfeng Xu; Terence M Peters
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-10

3.  Variations in tumor cell growth rates and metabolism with oxygen concentration, glucose concentration, and extracellular pH.

Authors:  J J Casciari; S V Sotirchos; R M Sutherland
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 4.  Three-dimensional spheroid model in tumor biology.

Authors:  M T Santini; G Rainaldi
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Determinability of model parameters in a two-stage deterministic cancer model.

Authors:  D Wiarda; C C Travis
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Computer-aided detection of kidney tumor on abdominal computed tomography scans.

Authors:  D Y Kim; J W Park
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Renal Tumor Quantification and Classification in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Jianhua Yao; Rabindra Gautam; James Peterson; Zhixi Li; W Marston Linehan; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 7.740

9.  Liver tumor volume estimation by semi-automatic segmentation method.

Authors:  Rui Lu; Pina Marziliano; Choon Hua Thng
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

10.  Pulmonary tumor volume delineation in PET images using deformable models.

Authors:  Aparna Kanakatte; Jayavardhana Gubbi; Bala Srinivasan; Nallasamy Mani; Tomas Kron; David Binns; Marimuthu Palaniswami
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2008
View more
  2 in total

1.  Interactive segmentation of plexiform neurofibroma tissue: method and preliminary performance evaluation.

Authors:  Lior Weizman; Lior Hoch; Dafna Ben Bashat; Leo Joskowicz; Li-tal Pratt; Shlomi Constantini; Liat Ben Sira
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Clinically driven design of multi-scale cancer models: the ContraCancrum project paradigm.

Authors:  K Marias; D Dionysiou; V Sakkalis; N Graf; R M Bohle; P V Coveney; S Wan; A Folarin; P Büchler; M Reyes; G Clapworthy; E Liu; J Sabczynski; T Bily; A Roniotis; M Tsiknakis; E Kolokotroni; S Giatili; C Veith; E Messe; H Stenzhorn; Yoo-Jin Kim; S Zasada; A N Haidar; C May; S Bauer; T Wang; Y Zhao; M Karasek; R Grewer; A Franz; G Stamatakos
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.906

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.