| Literature DB >> 20473773 |
Ronan Sulpice1, Agata Sienkiewicz-Porzucek, Sonia Osorio, Ina Krahnert, Mark Stitt, Alisdair R Fernie, Adriano Nunes-Nesi.
Abstract
Transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants were generated targeting the cytosolic NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (SlICDH1) via the RNA interference approach. The resultant transformants displayed a relatively mild reduction in the expression and activity of the target enzyme in the leaves. However, biochemical analyses revealed that the transgenic lines displayed a considerable shift in metabolism, being characterized by decreases in the levels of the TCA cycle intermediates, total amino acids, photosynthetic pigments, starch and NAD(P)H. The plants showed little change in photosynthesis with the exception of a minor decrease in maximum photosynthetic efficiency (F (v)/F (m)), and a small decrease in growth compared to the wild type. These results reveal that even small changes in cytosolic NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase activity lead to noticeable alterations in the activities of enzymes involved in primary nitrate assimilation and in the synthesis of 2-oxoglutarate derived amino acids. These data are discussed within the context of current models for the role of the various isoforms of isocitrate dehydrogenase within plant amino acid metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20473773 PMCID: PMC2945463 DOI: 10.1007/s00726-010-0617-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Amino Acids ISSN: 0939-4451 Impact factor: 3.520
Fig. 1Characterization and expression of tomato cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenases. Total NADP-dependent (a) and NAD-dependent (b) isocitrate dehydrogenase activities were determined in 5-week-old leaves taken from fully expanded source leaves of transgenic plants with altered expression of SlICDH1 as compared to wild type. c The relative transcript abundance of the various cellular isoforms of isocitrate dehydrogenase. The abundance of isocitrate dehydrogenase mRNAs was measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Growth phenotype of ICDH transgenic tomato plants: d total root dry weight, e total stem dry weight, f total leaf dry weight and g total plant dry weight of 6-weeks old plants. Values are presented as mean ± SE (n = 5). An asterisk indicates significantly different values obtained for each line in comparison to wild type as determined by the t test. Values marked with a different letter were determined by an ANOVA-Tukey test to be significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other. SlIDH1 (TC193092), SlICDH1 (TC202045); SlICDH3 mitochondrial ICDH like protein (TC196623); SlICDH2 (TC164449); SlIDH2 (TC198615). Black bar wild type, light gray bar line ICDH10, gray bar line ICDH20
Fig. 2Diurnal changes in sucrose (a) and starch (b) content in leaves of 6-week-old ICDH transgenic tomato plants. At each time point, samples were taken from mature source leaves, and the data presented are mean ± SE (n = 6). Nitrate (c), total amino acids (d) and protein (e) contents in leaves of ICDH transgenic tomato plants. The leaf material was harvested in the middle of the light period from 5-week-old plants. The data presented are mean ± SE (n = 6). An asterisk indicates significantly different values obtained for each line in comparison to wild type as determined by the t test. Values marked with a different letter were determined by an ANOVA-Tukey test to be significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other. The lines used were: wild type, black circles; ICDH10, gray circles; ICDH20, gray triangles. Shaded background indicates the dark period
Relative metabolite content of fully expanded illuminated leaves of 5-week-old plants of the ICDH transgenic tomato plants
| WT | ICDH10 | ICDH20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acids | |||
| β-Alanine | 1.000 ± 0.027a | 0.831 ± 0.081a | 1.002 ± 0.050a |
| Alaninea | 1.000 ± 0.170a |
|
|
| Arginine | 1.000 ± 0.096a |
| 1.062 ± 0.079a |
| Asparagine | 1.000 ± 0.047a |
| 1.293 ± 0.384a |
| Aspartic acid | 1.000 ± 0.048a |
| 0.931 ± 0.107a |
| GABA | 1.000 ± 0.036a | 1.063 ± 0.060a | 0.944 ± 0.074a |
| Glutamic acid | 1.000 ± 0.024a |
| 1.052 ± 0.047a |
| Glutamine | 1.000 ± 0.152a |
|
|
| Glycine | 1.000 ± 0.063a |
| 0.915 ± 0.055a |
| Isoleucinea | 1.000 ± 0.069a | 1.287 ± 0.145a |
|
| Phenylalanine | 1.000 ± 0.051a | 1.119 ± 0.081a | 0.846 ± 0.064a |
| Proline | 1.000 ± 0.065a |
|
|
| Serine | 1.000 ± 0.045a | 0.794 ± 0.093a | 1.017 ± 0.057a |
| Tryptophan | 1.000 ± 0.087a | 1.297 ± 0.233a | 0.998 ± 0.114a |
| Tyramine | 1.000 ± 0.083a |
| 1.015 ± 0.070a |
| Tyrosine | 1.000 ± 0.058a | 1.349 ± 0.189a | 0.961 ± 0.081a |
| Valine | 1.000 ± 0.054a | 1.338 ± 0.158a | 1.076 ± 0.045a |
| Organic acids | |||
| Citric acid | 1.000 ± 0.059a | 1.053 ± 0.048a | 0.928 ± 0.068a |
| Fumaric acida | 1.000 ± 0.065a |
|
|
| 2OG | 1.000 ± 0.098a | 0.982 ± 0.055a | 1.250 ± 0.225a |
| Glyceric acid | 1.000 ± 0.063a |
| 1.117 ± 0.083a |
| Glycolic acid | 1.000 ± 0.044a | 0.850 ± 0.069a | 1.030 ± 0.081a |
| Isocitric acid | 1.000 ± 0.051a | 0.868 ± 0.054a | 0.847 ± 0.154a |
| Lactic acid | 1.000 ± 0.060a | 0.919 ± 0.055a | 0.967 ± 0.087a |
| Maleic acid | 1.000 ± 0.074a |
|
|
| Citramalic acid | 1.000 ± 0.046a |
| 0.848 ± 0.060a |
| Malic acid | 1.000 ± 0.022a | 0.935 ± 0.037a | 1.007 ± 0.057a |
| Pyruvic acida | 1.000 ± 0.067a |
|
|
| Saccharic acid | 1.000 ± 0.091a | 0.957 ± 0.092a | 1.500 ± 0.264a |
| Succinic acida | 1.000 ± 0.080a |
| 0.835 ± 0.047a |
| Threonic acid | 1.000 ± 0.087a |
| 0.924 ± 0.024a |
| Sugars | |||
| Fructose | 1.000 ± 0.036a | 1.057 ± 0.039a | 1.060 ± 0.063a |
| Glucose | 1.000 ± 0.029a | 0.938 ± 0.054a | 1.052 ± 0.040a |
| Maltosea | 1.000 ± 0.047a |
| 1.180 ± 0.101a |
| Psicose | 1.000 ± 0.031a | 0.946 ± 0.085a |
|
| Sucrose | 1.000 ± 0.035a | 1.044 ± 0.032a | 1.059 ± 0.062a |
| Trehalos | 1.000 ± 0.045a | 0.858 ± 0.087a | 0.830 ± 0.092a |
| Xylosea | 1.000 ± 0.076a |
| 0.967 ± 0.103a |
Values set in bold type were determined by the t test to be significantly different from the wild type and values marked with a different letter were determined by the ANOVA-Tukey test to be significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other
aMetabolite values where the significance by ANOVA-Tukey and t test differed
Fig. 3Pigment content in leaves of ICDH transgenic tomato plants determined in 6-week-old fully expanded source leaves harvested in the middle of the day. Values presented are mean ± SE of six individual plants per line. An asterisk indicates significantly different values obtained for each line in comparison to wild type as determined by the t test. Values marked with a different letter were determined by an ANOVA-Tukey test to be significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other. The lines used were: wild type, black bars; ICDH10, light gray bars; ICDH20, gray bars
Enzyme activities in ICDH transgenic lines (nmol min−1 g−1 FW)
| WT | ICDH10 | ICDH20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrate synthase | 138.41 ± 15.18a | 133.38 ± 16.17a | 148.92 ± 19.78a |
| Aconitase | 351.34 ± 40.94a | 334.80a ± 58.79a | 464.59 ± 71.03a |
| GDH (NAD) | 226.60 ± 25.16a | 289.35 ± 18.06a |
|
| Nitrate reductase | 321.05 ± 32.76a | 351.73 ± 48.42a | 368.18 ± 33.05a |
| Pyruvate kinase | 1,108.64 ± 94.20a | 897.31 ± 132.58a | 1,211.20 ± 83.26a |
| PEP Carboxylase | 1,432.68 ± 96.30a | 1,086.12 ± 160.94a | 1,390.21 ± 111.76a |
| Fumarase | 5,121.71 ± 853.18a |
| 3,400.07 ± 350.61a |
| Glycerate kinase | 1,963.57 ± 135.33a | 2,175.45 ± 180.81a | 2,226.96 ± 200.21a |
| MDH (NAD) | 75,304.24 ± 4,558.54a | 81,992.53 ± 5,414.97a | 73,068.12 ± 4,914.24a |
| MDH total (NADP) | 5,464.99 ± 184.15a |
| 5,167.04 ± 245.29a |
| MDH initial (NADP) | 795.72 ± 26.40a |
|
|
| MDH activationa | 0.146 ± 0.003a | 0.148 ± 0.007a | 0.137 ± 0.007a |
Activities were determined in 5-week-old fully expanded source leaves harvested 6 h into the photoperiod. Data presented are mean ± SE of measurements from six independent plants per genotype. Values set in bold type were determined by the t test to be significantly different from the wild type and values marked with a different letter were determined by the ANOVA-Tukey test to be significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other
FW Fresh weight, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, MDH malate dehydrogenase, GDH glutamate dehydrogenase
aRatio of initial NADP-MDH activity to total NADP-MDH activity