BACKGROUND: More than 13,000 children annually in the United States and Canada under the age of 20 will be diagnosed with cancer at a mortality approaching 20% 1,2. Tumor samples obtained by autopsy provide an innovative way to study tumor progression, potentially aiding in the discovery of new treatments and increased survival rates. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to autopsies and develop guidelines for requesting autopsies for research purposes. PROCEDURE: Families of children treated for childhood cancer were referred by patient advocacy groups and surveyed about attitudes and experiences with research autopsies. From 60 interviews, barriers to autopsy and tumor banking were identified. An additional 14 interviews were conducted with medical and scientific experts. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of parents of deceased children did or would have consented to a research autopsy if presented with the option; however, only half of these families were given the opportunity to donate autopsy tissue for research. The most significant barriers were the physicians' reluctance to ask a grieving family and lack of awareness about research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: The value of donating tumor samples to research via an autopsy should be promoted to all groups managing pediatric cancer patients. Not only does autopsy tumor banking offer a potentially important medical and scientific impact, but the opportunity to contribute this Legacy Gift of autopsy tumor tissue also creates a positive outlet for the grieving family. Taking these findings into account, our multidisciplinary team has developed a curriculum addressing key barriers.
BACKGROUND: More than 13,000 children annually in the United States and Canada under the age of 20 will be diagnosed with cancer at a mortality approaching 20% 1,2. Tumor samples obtained by autopsy provide an innovative way to study tumor progression, potentially aiding in the discovery of new treatments and increased survival rates. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to autopsies and develop guidelines for requesting autopsies for research purposes. PROCEDURE: Families of children treated for childhood cancer were referred by patient advocacy groups and surveyed about attitudes and experiences with research autopsies. From 60 interviews, barriers to autopsy and tumor banking were identified. An additional 14 interviews were conducted with medical and scientific experts. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of parents of deceased children did or would have consented to a research autopsy if presented with the option; however, only half of these families were given the opportunity to donate autopsy tissue for research. The most significant barriers were the physicians' reluctance to ask a grieving family and lack of awareness about research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: The value of donating tumor samples to research via an autopsy should be promoted to all groups managing pediatric cancerpatients. Not only does autopsy tumor banking offer a potentially important medical and scientific impact, but the opportunity to contribute this Legacy Gift of autopsy tumor tissue also creates a positive outlet for the grieving family. Taking these findings into account, our multidisciplinary team has developed a curriculum addressing key barriers.
Authors: Barbara S Paugh; Alberto Broniscer; Chunxu Qu; Claudia P Miller; Junyuan Zhang; Ruth G Tatevossian; James M Olson; J Russell Geyer; Susan N Chi; Nasjla Saba da Silva; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Justin N Baker; Amar Gajjar; David W Ellison; Suzanne J Baker Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alberto Broniscer; Justin N Baker; Suzanne J Baker; Susan N Chi; J Russell Geyer; E Brannon Morris; Amar Gajjar Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michelle Monje; Siddhartha S Mitra; Morgan E Freret; Tal B Raveh; James Kim; Marilyn Masek; Joanne L Attema; Gordon Li; Terri Haddix; Michael S B Edwards; Paul G Fisher; Irving L Weissman; David H Rowitch; Hannes Vogel; Albert J Wong; Philip A Beachy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Odile Oberlin; Annie Rey; Elizabeth Lyden; Gianni Bisogno; Michael C G Stevens; William H Meyer; Modesto Carli; James R Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gang Wu; Alberto Broniscer; Troy A McEachron; Charles Lu; Barbara S Paugh; Jared Becksfort; Chunxu Qu; Li Ding; Robert Huether; Matthew Parker; Junyuan Zhang; Amar Gajjar; Michael A Dyer; Charles G Mullighan; Richard J Gilbertson; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; James R Downing; David W Ellison; Jinghui Zhang; Suzanne J Baker Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Katharine Rae Lange; Cheryl Fischer; Prajwal Rajappa; Scott Connors; David Pisapia; Jeffrey P Greenfield; Himisha Beltran; Mark Rubin; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Yasmin Khakoo Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2017-09-25
Authors: Jody E Hooper; Emma L Cantor; Macgregor S Ehlen; Avirup Banerjee; Suman Malempati; Peter Stenzel; Randy L Woltjer; Regina Gandour-Edwards; Neal C Goodwin; Yan Yang; Pali Kaur; Carol J Bult; Susan D Airhart; Charles Keller Journal: Sarcoma Date: 2015-11-30