Literature DB >> 20473537

Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following one-stage and three-stage surgical protocols.

Piotr Fudalej1, Christos Katsaros, Catharina Bongaarts, Zofia Dudkiewicz, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare dental arch relationship following one-stage and three-stage surgical protocols of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Dental casts of 61 children (mean age, 11.2 years; SD, 1.7), consecutively treated in one center with one-stage closure of the complete cleft at 9.2 months (SD, 2.0), were compared with a sample of 97 patients (mean age, 8.7 years; SD, 0.9), consecutively treated with a three-stage protocol including delayed hard palate closure in another center. The dental casts were assigned random numbers to blind their origin. Four raters graded dental arch relationship and palatal morphology using the EUROCRAN index. The strength of agreement of rating was assessed with kappa statistics. Independent t tests were run to compare the EUROCRAN scores between one-stage and three-stage samples, and Fisher's exact tests were performed to evaluate differences of distribution of the EUROCRAN grades. The intra- and inter-rater agreement was moderate to very good. Dental arch relationship in the one-stage sample was less favorable than in three-stage group (mean scores, 2.58 and 1.97 for one-stage and three-stage samples, respectively; p < 0.000). Palatal morphology in the one-stage sample was more favorable than in the three-stage group (mean scores, 1.79 and 1.96 for one-stage and three-stage samples, respectively; p = 0.047). The dental arch relationship following one-stage repair was less favorable than the outcome of three-stage repair. The palatal morphology following one-stage repair, however, was more favorable than the outcome of three-stage repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473537     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0420-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  41 in total

1.  Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study.

Authors:  M J Trenouth; G Laitung; A J Naftel
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions.

Authors:  W C Shaw; E Dahl; C Asher-McDade; V Brattström; M Mars; J McWilliam; K Mølsted; D A Plint; B Prahl-Andersen; C Roberts
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-09

3.  A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: reproducibility and validity.

Authors:  N E Atack; I S Hathorn; G Semb; T Dowell; J R Sandy
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1997-05

4.  The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate.

Authors:  M Mars; D A Plint; W J Houston; O Bergland; G Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1987-10

5.  Maxillofacial morphology in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by one-stage simultaneous repair.

Authors:  Nedim Savaci; Mübin Hoşnuter; Zekeriya Tosun; Abdullah Demir
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Dentocraniofacial morphology of 21 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  Miranda Corbo; Thierry Dujardin; Viviane de Maertelaer; Chantal Malevez; Régine Glineur
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-11

7.  The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationships.

Authors:  Kirsten Mølsted; Viveca Brattström; Birte Prahl-Andersen; William C Shaw; Gunvor Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-01

8.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships.

Authors:  M Mars; C Asher-McDade; V Brattström; E Dahl; J McWilliam; K Mølsted; D A Plint; B Prahl-Andersen; G Semb; W C Shaw
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-09

9.  Relationship between cleft severity and dentocraniofacial morphology in Japanese subjects with isolated cleft palate and complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  A Suzuki; Y Mukai; M Ohishi; Y Miyanoshita; H Tashiro
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1993-03

10.  Long-term follow-up of UCLP at the Reine Fabiola Children's Hospital.

Authors:  A De Mey; G Swennen; C Malevez; M George; A L Mansbach
Journal:  B-ENT       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.082

View more
  7 in total

1.  Predictors of poor dental arch relationship in young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yuh-Jia Hsieh; Yu-Fang Liao; Akshai Shetty
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  An overview of indices used to measure treatment effectiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Sanjida Haque; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Anas Imran Arshad
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

3.  Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: comparison of dental arch relationships and dental indices at 5, 8, and 10 years.

Authors:  Arja Heliövaara; Annelise Küseler; Pål Skaare; Haydn Bellardie; Kirsten Mølsted; Agneta Karsten; Agneta Marcusson; Sara Rizell; Eli Brinck; Paul Sæle; Midia Najar Chalien; Jeanette Mooney; Phil Eyres; William Shaw; Gunvor Semb
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.131

4.  Occlusal, chewing, and tasting characteristics associated with orofacial dysfunctions in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ana Bheatriz Marangoni Montes; Thais Marchini de Oliveira; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião; Taís de Souza Barbosa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Rating dental arch relationships and palatal morphology with the EUROCRAN index on three different formats of dental casts in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Alijda J Sabelis; Mette A R Kuijpers; Rania M Nada; Yu-Ting Chiu; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The effect of various factors on the dental arch relationship in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate children assessed by new approach: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sanjida Haque; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Mohd Fadhli Khamis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Which index should be used to measure primary surgical outcome for unilateral cleft lip and palate patients?

Authors:  Timothy Jones; Sam Leary; Nikki Atack; Tony Ireland; Jonathan Sandy
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.