Literature DB >> 26988992

Which index should be used to measure primary surgical outcome for unilateral cleft lip and palate patients?

Timothy Jones1, Sam Leary2, Nikki Atack3, Tony Ireland2, Jonathan Sandy2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal dentoalveolar measure to assess unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patient plaster models.
DESIGN: The models of 34 patients with UCLP taken at 5, 10, and 15-20 years of age were scored by two examiners on two separate occasions using five indices: the 5 Year Olds' (5YO), GOSLON, Modified Huddart/Bodenham (MHB), EUROCRAN, and Overjet. Reliability, validity, and ease of use were recorded for each index/examiner.
SETTING: All models were scored in either Bristol Dental Hospital or Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom by senior orthodontic clinicians.
RESULTS: Highest overall reliability was seen with MHB (Kappa = 0.56-0.97). Predictive validity was similar for MHB, GOSLON, and 5YO with a 50-65 per cent prediction of final outcome from 5 and 10 years. EUROCRAN palatal index showed no clear predictive validity (Spearman's correlation = 0.20-0.21). Agreement to the gold standard 5YO score at the 5-year age group was high for MHB (Kappa = 0.83) and moderate for GOSLON (Kappa = 0.59). Agreement to the gold standard GOSLON score at 10 years was highest for 5YO (Kappa = 0.69), followed by Overjet (Kappa = 0.59) and MHB (Kappa = 0.46). Time to score 34 models per index (minutes): GOSLON (13.4) < Overjet (13.6) < 5YO (19.4) < EUROCRAN (24.8) < MHB (27.4).
CONCLUSION: As an outcome measure of UCLP models, only MHB and 5YO indices can be recommended for use at 5 years of age and GOSLON at 10 years of age.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26988992      PMCID: PMC5866712          DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjw013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Outcomes of cleft care in Western Australia: a pilot study.

Authors:  A C Williams; N C Johnson; S Singer; P Southall; S Mildinhall; G Semb; D Sell; S Thomas; J R Sandy
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.291

2.  Preliminary investigation of a modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system for assessment of maxillary arch constriction in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects.

Authors:  P A Mossey; J D Clark; D Gray
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following one-stage and three-stage surgical protocols.

Authors:  Piotr Fudalej; Christos Katsaros; Catharina Bongaarts; Zofia Dudkiewicz; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dental arch relationships after two-flap palatoplasty in Taiwanese patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Y-F Liao; I-F Lin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: reproducibility and validity.

Authors:  N E Atack; I S Hathorn; G Semb; T Dowell; J R Sandy
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1997-05

6.  Dental arch relationships following palatoplasty for cleft lip and palate repair.

Authors:  P Fudalej; C Katsaros; Z Dudkiewicz; B Offert; W Piwowar; M Kuijpers; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate.

Authors:  M Mars; D A Plint; W J Houston; O Bergland; G Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1987-10

8.  The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationships.

Authors:  Kirsten Mølsted; Viveca Brattström; Birte Prahl-Andersen; William C Shaw; Gunvor Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-01

9.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships.

Authors:  M Mars; C Asher-McDade; V Brattström; E Dahl; J McWilliam; K Mølsted; D A Plint; B Prahl-Andersen; G Semb; W C Shaw
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-09

10.  A comparison of craniofacial form in Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different primary surgical techniques.

Authors:  Chris D Johnston; Alan G Leonard; Donald J Burden; Patrick F McSherry
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2004-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: comparison of dental arch relationships and dental indices at 5, 8, and 10 years.

Authors:  Arja Heliövaara; Annelise Küseler; Pål Skaare; Haydn Bellardie; Kirsten Mølsted; Agneta Karsten; Agneta Marcusson; Sara Rizell; Eli Brinck; Paul Sæle; Midia Najar Chalien; Jeanette Mooney; Phil Eyres; William Shaw; Gunvor Semb
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.131

Review 2.  Predictive validity of the GOSLON Yardstick index in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cindy Buj-Acosta; Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo; José María Montiel-Company; Alberto Albaladejo; Carlos Bellot-Arcís
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Three-dimensional evaluation of surgical techniques in neonates with orofacial cleft.

Authors:  Cleide Felício Carvalho Carrara; Eloá Cristina Passucci Ambrosio; Bianca Zeponi Fernandes Mello; Paula Karine Jorge; Simone Soares; Maria Aparecida Andrade Moreira Machado; Thais Marchini Oliveira
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.