Literature DB >> 21837387

Predictors of poor dental arch relationship in young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Yuh-Jia Hsieh1, Yu-Fang Liao, Akshai Shetty.   

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional outcome study using retrospective data capture of treatment histories was to examine the characteristics of young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate who had poor dental arch relationship (i.e., Goslon 5). The study sample comprised 120 children born with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate between 1995 and 2003, and were aged between 5.0 and 7.0 years (mean age, 5.1 years) at the time of data collection. The dental arch relationship was assessed using the Goslon yardstick from intraoral dental photographs. An independent investigator recorded treatment histories from the clinical notes. The inter- and intraexaminer agreements evaluated by weighted kappa statistics were high. There was no association between dental arch relationship and the type of presurgical orthopedics or pharyngeal flap. Dental arch relationship was associated with the initial cleft size (odds ratio, OR = 1.3; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.1-1.5, p < 0.01), surgeon grade for palate repair (OR = 5.0, 95% CI = 1.2-19.9, p < 0.05), and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.0-8.1, p = 0.05). These data suggest that intraoral dental photographs provide a reliable method for rating dental arch relationship. Wide initial cleft, high-volume surgeon, and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty are predictors of poor dental arch relationship outcome in young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. These findings may improve treatment outcome by modifying the treatment protocol for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21837387     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0601-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  34 in total

1.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions.

Authors:  W C Shaw; E Dahl; C Asher-McDade; V Brattström; M Mars; J McWilliam; K Mølsted; D A Plint; B Prahl-Andersen; C Roberts
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-09

2.  Two-stage palate repair with delayed hard palate closure is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yu-Fang Liao; I-Ying Yang; Ruby Wang; Claudia Yun; Chiung-Shing Huang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following one-stage and three-stage surgical protocols.

Authors:  Piotr Fudalej; Christos Katsaros; Catharina Bongaarts; Zofia Dudkiewicz; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dental arch relationships after two-flap palatoplasty in Taiwanese patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Y-F Liao; I-F Lin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Intraoral photographs for rating dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yu-Fang Liao; Chiung-Shing Huang; I-Feng Lin
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2009-02-01

Review 6.  Pharyngeal flap and facial growth.

Authors:  G Semb; W C Shaw
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1990-07

7.  The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate.

Authors:  M Mars; D A Plint; W J Houston; O Bergland; G Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1987-10

8.  Analysis of primary gingivoperiosteoplasty in alveolar cleft repair. Part I: Facial growth.

Authors:  K O Henkel; K K Gundlach
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Morphologic and management characteristics of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate who required maxillary advancement.

Authors:  Snehlata Oberoi; Radhika Chigurupati; Karin Vargervik
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-01

10.  A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion.

Authors:  Samuel Berkowitz; Marta Mejia; Anna Bystrik
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  3 in total

1.  An overview of indices used to measure treatment effectiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Sanjida Haque; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Anas Imran Arshad
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

2.  Occlusal, chewing, and tasting characteristics associated with orofacial dysfunctions in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ana Bheatriz Marangoni Montes; Thais Marchini de Oliveira; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião; Taís de Souza Barbosa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effects of early and late cheiloplasty on anterior part of maxillary dental arch development in infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Silvia Valentová-Strenáčiková; Radovan Malina
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.