Literature DB >> 11414588

Inference procedures for assessing interobserver agreement among multiple raters.

M Altaye1, A Donner, N Klar.   

Abstract

We propose a new procedure for constructing inferences about a measure of interobserver agreement in studies involving a binary outcome and multiple raters. The proposed procedure, based on a chi-square goodness-of-fit test as applied to the correlated binomial model (Bahadur, 1961, in Studies in Item Analysis and Prediction, 158-176), is an extension of the goodness-of-fit procedure developed by Donner and Eliasziw (1992, Statistics in Medicine 11, 1511-1519) for the case of two raters. The new procedure is shown to provide confidence-interval coverage levels that are close to nominal over a wide range of parameter combinations. The procedure also provides a sample-size formula that may be used to determine the required number of subjects and raters for such studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11414588     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00584.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Sample size requirements for training to a kappa agreement criterion on clinical dementia ratings.

Authors:  Rochelle E Tractenberg; Futoshi Yumoto; Shelia Jin; John C Morris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Sheng Wu; Catherine M Crespi; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Inter-rater agreement in defining chemical incidents at the National Poisons Information Service, London.

Authors:  I Abubakar; G S Leonardi; N Edwards; N Herriott
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Bias-corrected estimator for intraclass correlation coefficient in the balanced one-way random effects model.

Authors:  Eshetu G Atenafu; Jemila S Hamid; Teresa To; Andrew R Willan; Brian M Feldman; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Assessing agreement between multiple raters with missing rating information, applied to breast cancer tumour grading.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; Andrew G Lynch; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Rudolf Hanka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Estimation of an inter-rater intra-class correlation coefficient that overcomes common assumption violations in the assessment of health measurement scales.

Authors:  Carly A Bobak; Paul J Barr; A James O'Malley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Reliability of T-WSI to Evaluate Neighborhoods Walkability and Its Changes over Time.

Authors:  Daniela D'Alessandro; Diego Valeri; Letizia Appolloni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.