Literature DB >> 20466596

Preference, expectation, and satisfaction in a clinical trial of behavioral interventions for acute and sub-acute low back pain.

Steven Z George1, Michael E Robinson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The equivalency of behavioral interventions has led to the consideration of whether patient-related factors influence clinical trial outcomes. The primary purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine if treatment preference and patient expectation were predictors of trial outcomes and if selected patient-satisfaction items were appropriate as outcome measures. Perceived effectiveness, treatment preference, and patient expectation were assessed before random assignment, and patient satisfaction was assessed 6 months later. Patient preference was associated with perceived effectiveness for those with no treatment preference and those preferring graded exposure. Higher patient expectation was associated with higher perceived effectiveness ratings for all treatments in the clinical trial. Patients with no strong treatment preferences had larger 6-month improvements in pain intensity and disability, while patients with higher expectations had lower disability at baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Patient satisfaction rates did not differ based on treatment received. Patient satisfaction was highest with treatment delivery and much lower with treatment effect. Patient satisfaction was uniformly associated with expectations being met, but only satisfaction with treatment effect was associated with lower pain and disability scores. These data support assessment of treatment preference and patient expectation as predictors and patient satisfaction as an outcome measure in low back pain (LBP) clinical trials. PERSPECTIVE: These data indicate treatment preference potentially impacts rate of improvement for patients with low back pain. Patient expectation did not impact rate of improvement, but those with higher expectations had lower pain and disability scores throughout the trial. Optimal assessment of patient satisfaction should include items that separately consider treatment delivery and effect.
Copyright © 2010 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466596      PMCID: PMC2921587          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  44 in total

1.  Addition of choice of complementary therapies to usual care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Eisenberg; Diana E Post; Roger B Davis; Maureen T Connelly; Anna T R Legedza; Andrea L Hrbek; Lisa A Prosser; Julie E Buring; Thomas S Inui; Daniel C Cherkin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The impact of patient expectations on outcomes in four randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Klaus Linde; Claudia M Witt; Andrea Streng; Wolfgang Weidenhammer; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Benno Brinkhaus; Stefan N Willich; Dieter Melchart
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Patient satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain: predictors and relationship to compliance.

Authors:  Adam T Hirsh; James W Atchison; Jerry J Berger; Lori B Waxenberg; Ann Lafayette-Lucey; Bernard B Bulcourf; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Comparison of physical treatments versus a brief pain-management programme for back pain in primary care: a randomised clinical trial in physiotherapy practice.

Authors:  E M Hay; R Mullis; M Lewis; K Vohora; C J Main; P Watson; K S Dziedzic; J Sim; C Minns Lowe; P R Croft
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jun 11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective.

Authors:  Michael E Robinson; Jennifer L Brown; Steven Z George; Penny S Edwards; James W Atchison; Adam T Hirsh; Lori B Waxenberg; Virgil Wittmer; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Initial patient and clinician expectations of return to work after acute onset of work-related low back pain.

Authors:  Sachin Kapoor; William S Shaw; Glenn Pransky; William Patterson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Patient expectations as predictors of outcome in patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  Samuel S Myers; Russell S Phillips; Roger B Davis; Daniel C Cherkin; Anna Legedza; Ted J Kaptchuk; Andrea Hrbek; Julie E Buring; Diana Post; Maureen T Connelly; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Donald Casey; J Thomas Cross; Paul Shekelle; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Dorcas Beaton; Charles S Cleeland; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Robert D Kerns; Deborah N Ader; Nancy Brandenburg; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Julie Chandler; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Nathaniel P Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Cynthia McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Henry J McQuay; Sanjay Patel; Linda Porter; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Dennis A Revicki; Margaret Rothman; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett R Stacey; Joseph W Stauffer; Thorsten von Stein; Richard E White; James Witter; Stojan Zavisic
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229].

Authors:  Rob J E M Smeets; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Alita Hidding; Arnold D M Kester; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Antonia C M van Geel; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  24 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Can we predict response to the McKenzie method in patients with acute low back pain? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles Sheets; Luciana A C Machado; Mark Hancock; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar; Carol Armour; John M Rose; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Amy Gravely; Sean Nugent; Agnes C Jensen; Beth DeRonne; Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Kurt Kroenke; Matthew J Bair; Siamak Noorbaloochi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Evaluation of self-reported work ability and usefulness of interventions among sick-listed patients.

Authors:  Charlotte Wåhlin; Kerstin Ekberg; Jan Persson; Lars Bernfort; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

6.  Contemporary biopsychosocial exercise prescription for chronic low back pain: questioning core stability programs and considering context.

Authors:  Peter Stilwell; Katherine Harman
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2017-03

7.  Chronic pain is associated with a brain aging biomarker in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim; Joseph L Riley; Adam J Woods; Eric Porges; Ronald Cohen; James Cole
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimittri Delevry; Quang A Le
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Psychometric evaluation of a multi-dimensional measure of satisfaction with behavioral interventions.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Mary Fox
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  "I Was a Little Surprised": Qualitative Insights From Patients Enrolled in a 12-Month Trial Comparing Opioids With Nonopioid Medications for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Marianne S Matthias; Melvin T Donaldson; Agnes C Jensen; Erin E Krebs
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.