Literature DB >> 17909209

Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society.

Roger Chou1, Amir Qaseem, Vincenza Snow, Donald Casey, J Thomas Cross, Paul Shekelle, Douglas K Owens.   

Abstract

RECOMMENDATION 1: Clinicians should conduct a focused history and physical examination to help place patients with low back pain into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause. The history should include assessment of psychosocial risk factors, which predict risk for chronic disabling back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: Clinicians should not routinely obtain imaging or other diagnostic tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: Clinicians should perform diagnostic imaging and testing for patients with low back pain when severe or progressive neurologic deficits are present or when serious underlying conditions are suspected on the basis of history and physical examination (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 4: Clinicians should evaluate patients with persistent low back pain and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (preferred) or computed tomography only if they are potential candidates for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for suspected radiculopathy) (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 5: Clinicians should provide patients with evidence-based information on low back pain with regard to their expected course, advise patients to remain active, and provide information about effective self-care options (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 6: For patients with low back pain, clinicians should consider the use of medications with proven benefits in conjunction with back care information and self-care. Clinicians should assess severity of baseline pain and functional deficits, potential benefits, risks, and relative lack of long-term efficacy and safety data before initiating therapy (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). For most patients, first-line medication options are acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RECOMMENDATION 7: For patients who do not improve with self-care options, clinicians should consider the addition of nonpharmacologic therapy with proven benefits-for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pain, intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or progressive relaxation (weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909209     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  655 in total

Review 1.  Implications of opioid analgesia for medically complicated patients.

Authors:  Howard Smith; Patricia Bruckenthal
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  [Importance of education level for effectiveness of multimodal pain therapy].

Authors:  I Haase; O Kuhnt; K Klimczyk
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango.

Authors:  J T Kessler; M Melloh; Thomas Zweig; E Aghayev; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Epidural steroid injections.

Authors:  Indy M Wilkinson; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

5.  Arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain: evidence-based clinical risk assessment for physical activity and exercise clearance.

Authors:  Jamie Burr; Roy Shephard; Stephen Cornish; Hassanali Vatanparast; Philip Chilibeck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  The assessment of function: How is it measured? A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Robert C Manske
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Fatemeh Yazdi; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Anita Gross; Maurits Van Tulder; Lina Santaguida; Joel Gagnier; Carlo Ammendolia; Trish Dryden; Steve Doucette; Becky Skidmore; Raymond Daniel; Thomas Ostermann; Sophia Tsouros
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Update in pain medicine.

Authors:  Daniel P Alford; Erin E Krebs; Ian A Chen; Christina Nicolaidis; Matthew J Bair; Jane Liebschutz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Exercise prescription for chronic back or neck pain: who prescribes it? who gets it? What is prescribed?

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; Timothy S Carey; George M Holmes; Andrea S Wallace; Liana D Castel; Jane D Darter; Anne M Jackman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-02-15

Review 10.  Chronic low back pain: a mini-review on pharmacological management and pathophysiological insights from clinical and pre-clinical data.

Authors:  Thomas S W Park; Andy Kuo; Maree T Smith
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.