Literature DB >> 15950716

Comparison of physical treatments versus a brief pain-management programme for back pain in primary care: a randomised clinical trial in physiotherapy practice.

E M Hay1, R Mullis, M Lewis, K Vohora, C J Main, P Watson, K S Dziedzic, J Sim, C Minns Lowe, P R Croft.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for the management of low back pain in primary care emphasise the importance of recognising and addressing psychosocial factors at an early stage. We compared the effectiveness of a brief pain-management programme with physiotherapy incorporating manual therapy for the reduction of disability at 12 months in patients consulting primary care with subacute low back pain.
METHODS: For this pragmatic, multicentre, randomised clinical trial, eligible participants consulted primary care with non-specific low back pain of less than 12 weeks' duration. They were randomly assigned either a programme of pain management (n=201) or manual therapy (n=201). The primary outcome was change in the score on the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: Of 544 patients assessed for eligibility, 402 were recruited (mean age 40.6 years) and 329 (82%) reached 12-month follow-up. Mean disability scores were 13.8 (SD 4.8) for the pain-management group and 13.3 (4.9) for the manual-therapy group. The mean decreases in disability scores were 8.8 (6.4) and 8.8 (6.1) at 12 months (difference 0 [95% CI -1.3 to 1.4], p=0.99), and median numbers of physiotherapy visits per patient were three (IQR one to five) and four (two to five), respectively (p=0.001). One adverse reaction (an exacerbation of pain after the initial assessment) was recorded.
INTERPRETATION: Brief pain management techniques delivered by appropriately trained clinicians offer an alternative to physiotherapy incorporating manual therapy and could provide a more efficient first-line approach for management of non-specific subacute low back pain in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15950716     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66696-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  43 in total

1.  Clinicians' perceptions of reporting methods for back pain trials: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Martin Underwood; Dawn Carnes; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Acupressure for low back pain.

Authors:  Helen Frost; Sarah Stewart-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

Review 3.  Interrelations between pain and alcohol: An integrative review.

Authors:  Emily L Zale; Stephen A Maisto; Joseph W Ditre
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-02-25

4.  National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Mette Jensen Stochkendahl; Per Kjaer; Jan Hartvigsen; Alice Kongsted; Jens Aaboe; Margrethe Andersen; Mikkel Ø Andersen; Gilles Fournier; Betina Højgaard; Martin Bach Jensen; Lone Donbæk Jensen; Ture Karbo; Lilli Kirkeskov; Martin Melbye; Lone Morsel-Carlsen; Jan Nordsteen; Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson; Zoreh Rasti; Peter Frost Silbye; Morten Zebitz Steiness; Simon Tarp; Morten Vaagholt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Barriers and progress in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Annette Bishop; Kate M Dunn; Chris J Main
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  The experience and management of neck pain in general practice: the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Martin Scherer; Helene Schaefer; Eva Blozik; Jean-François Chenot; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Worksite interventions for preventing physical deterioration among employees in job-groups with high physical work demands: background, design and conceptual model of FINALE.

Authors:  Andreas Holtermann; Marie B Jørgensen; Bibi Gram; Jeanette R Christensen; Anne Faber; Kristian Overgaard; John Ektor-Andersen; Ole S Mortensen; Gisela Sjøgaard; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Low back pain: what determines functional outcome at six months? An observational study.

Authors:  Michele C Harms; Charles E Peers; Derek Chase
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Testing a model of association between patient identified problems and responses to global measures of health in low back pain patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ricky Mullis; Martyn Lewis; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.