BACKGROUND: Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence. DESIGN: We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES). KEY RESULTS: We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.
BACKGROUND: Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence. DESIGN: We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES). KEY RESULTS: We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.
Authors: Phayom Sookaneknun; Robert M E Richards; Jaratbhan Sanguansermsri; Chai Teerasut Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2004-11-02 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Richard V Birtwhistle; Marshall S Godwin; M Dianne Delva; R Ian Casson; Miu Lam; Susan E MacDonald; Rachelle Seguin; Lucia Rühland Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-01-15
Authors: David H Smith; Judith M Kramer; Nancy Perrin; Richard Platt; Douglas W Roblin; Kimberly Lane; Michael Goodman; Winnie W Nelson; Xiuhai Yang; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-03-10
Authors: Audrey J Weymiller; Victor M Montori; Lesley A Jones; Amiram Gafni; Gordon H Guyatt; Sandra C Bryant; Teresa J H Christianson; Rebecca J Mullan; Steven A Smith Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-05-28
Authors: Kouta Ito; William H Shrank; Jerry Avorn; Amanda R Patrick; Troyen A Brennan; Elliot M Antman; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Kathleen E Walsh; Sarah L Cutrona; Patricia L Kavanagh; Lori E Crosby; Chris Malone; Katie Lobner; David G Bundy Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Stephen P Fortmann; Jennifer Kuntz; Leah L Zullig; Phil Mendys; Monika Safford; Shobha Phansalkar; Tracy Wang; Maureen H Rumptz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jörn F Dopheide; Martin Scheer; Christopher Doppler; Viviane Obst; Pamela Stein; Markus Vosseler; Nico Abegunewardene; Tommaso Gori; Thomas Münzel; Andreas Daiber; Markus P Radsak; Christine Espinola-Klein Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Ian M Kronish; Michael A Diefenbach; Donald E Edmondson; L Alison Phillips; Kezhen Fei; Carol R Horowitz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 5.128