BACKGROUND: Although beta-blockers are routinely prescribed at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction (MI), patients' adherence has been shown to decline substantially over time. We sought to test the hypothesis that a simple, direct-to-patient intervention can improve adherence to beta-blocker therapy following MI. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 4 geographically dispersed health maintenance organizations testing the hypothesis that a simple direct-to-patient intervention could improve adherence. The study was carried out from June 2004 to March 2005. The primary analyses were based on 836 post-MI patients who were dispensed a beta-blocker prescription after discharge. The intervention consisted of 2 mailings 2 months apart describing the importance of beta-blocker use. The main outcomes were proportion of days covered with beta-blocker therapy and percentage of patients with at least 80% of days covered in the 9 months after the first mailing. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, total medications dispensed, days between MI and intervention, and intervention site. RESULTS: Over the entire follow-up period, patients in the treatment arm had a mean absolute increase of 4.3% of days covered per month compared with patients in the control arm (a 5.7% relative change from baseline), representing 1.3 extra days (P = .04). Treatment patients were 17% more likely (relative risk, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.29) to have 80% of days covered. For every 16 patients receiving the intervention, 1 additional patient would become adherent (80% or more days covered per month). CONCLUSION: A low-cost, easily replicable effort to increase adherence can have a demonstrable impact on beta-blocker adherence following MI. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00211172.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although beta-blockers are routinely prescribed at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction (MI), patients' adherence has been shown to decline substantially over time. We sought to test the hypothesis that a simple, direct-to-patient intervention can improve adherence to beta-blocker therapy following MI. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 4 geographically dispersed health maintenance organizations testing the hypothesis that a simple direct-to-patient intervention could improve adherence. The study was carried out from June 2004 to March 2005. The primary analyses were based on 836 post-MI patients who were dispensed a beta-blocker prescription after discharge. The intervention consisted of 2 mailings 2 months apart describing the importance of beta-blocker use. The main outcomes were proportion of days covered with beta-blocker therapy and percentage of patients with at least 80% of days covered in the 9 months after the first mailing. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, total medications dispensed, days between MI and intervention, and intervention site. RESULTS: Over the entire follow-up period, patients in the treatment arm had a mean absolute increase of 4.3% of days covered per month compared with patients in the control arm (a 5.7% relative change from baseline), representing 1.3 extra days (P = .04). Treatment patients were 17% more likely (relative risk, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.29) to have 80% of days covered. For every 16 patients receiving the intervention, 1 additional patient would become adherent (80% or more days covered per month). CONCLUSION: A low-cost, easily replicable effort to increase adherence can have a demonstrable impact on beta-blocker adherence following MI. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00211172.
Authors: Sarah L Cutrona; Niteesh K Choudhry; Michael A Fischer; Amber Servi; Joshua N Liberman; Troyen A Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Kouta Ito; William H Shrank; Jerry Avorn; Amanda R Patrick; Troyen A Brennan; Elliot M Antman; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Julia Freigofas; Hanna Marita Seidling; Renate Quinzler; Ben Schöttker; Kai-Uwe Saum; Hermann Brenner; Walter Emil Haefeli Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maria I Danila; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth J Rahn; Amy S Mudano; David T Redden; Peng Li; Jeroan J Allison; Fred A Anderson; Allison Wyman; Susan L Greenspan; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jeri W Nieves; Stuart L Silverman; Ethel S Siris; Nelson B Watts; Michael J Miller; Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 6.741