Literature DB >> 20462501

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex interferes with episodic encoding and retrieval for both verbal and non-verbal materials.

Geneviève Gagnon1, Sophie Blanchet, Simon Grondin, Cyril Schneider.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies report that encoding and retrieval processes of episodic memory constantly activate the left and right prefrontal cortex, even in the simplest memory tasks. Conversely, individuals with frontal lesions displayed impaired memory performance mainly in the most complex memory tasks. This discrepancy regarding the involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) may be explained by methodological divergences. Our goal was to study the critical role of the DLPFC in episodic encoding and retrieval processes according to the nature of the material (verbal or non-verbal) by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Eighteen healthy adults performed a recognition task with words or random shapes. Paired-pulse TMS was applied (3-ms inter-pulse interval, at 90% of motor threshold) for inducing transient and safe interferences over the left or right DLPFCs during encoding or retrieval. Data analysis showed a reduced discrimination rate following TMS over the left DLPFC during encoding, as compared to a sham condition. Both hit and discrimination rates were also reduced after TMS over the right DLPFC, compared to TMS over left DLPFC, during retrieval. There was no difference between verbal and non-verbal material. Our results showed that the left and the right DLPFC play a critical role respectively in episodic encoding and retrieval processes for both verbal and non-verbal materials. Our findings are discussed in light of the findings obtained from other complementary approaches. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20462501     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  17 in total

1.  Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System: Some Practical Ethical Considerations.

Authors:  Laura Y Cabrera; Bernice S Elger
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 2.  Learning and memory.

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Kathy Ran; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

3.  Low-frequency direct cortical stimulation of left superior frontal gyrus enhances working memory performance.

Authors:  Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Caroline Lustenberger; Eldad Hadar; Hae Won Shin; Flavio Frӧhlich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Network-Targeted, Multi-site Direct Cortical Stimulation Enhances Working Memory by Modulating Phase Lag of Low-Frequency Oscillations.

Authors:  Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Justin Riddle; Wei Angel Huang; Eldad Hadar; Hae Won Shin; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces the cost of performing a cognitive task on gait and postural control.

Authors:  Junhong Zhou; Ying Hao; Ye Wang; Azizah Jor'dan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Jue Zhang; Jing Fang; Brad Manor
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  The effects of lateral prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on item memory encoding.

Authors:  Robert S Blumenfeld; Taraz G Lee; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Neurostimulation for Memory Enhancement in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Stephen Meisenhelter; Barbara C Jobst
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Errorless and errorful learning modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Anke Hammer; Bahram Mohammadi; Marlen Schmicker; Sina Saliger; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, working memory and episodic memory processes: insight through transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques.

Authors:  Michela Balconi
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.203

10.  Application of long-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to motion-sensitive visual cortex does not lead to changes in motion discrimination.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Gamboa; Alexandra Brito; Zachary Abzug; Tracy D'Arbeloff; Lysianne Beynel; Erik A Wing; Moritz Dannhauer; Hannah Palmer; Susan A Hilbig; Courtney A Crowell; Sicong Liu; Rachel Donaldson; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Angel V Peterchev; Marc A Sommer; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.