Literature DB >> 20461395

Comparison of mortality and incidence solid cancer risk after radiation exposure in the Techa River Cohort.

M Eidemüller1, E Ostroumova, L Krestinina, S Epiphanova, A Akleyev, P Jacob.   

Abstract

In the present paper, analysis of solid cancer mortality and incidence risk after radiation exposure in the Techa River Cohort in the Southern Urals region of Russia is described. Residents along the Techa River received protracted exposure to ionizing radiation in the 1950s due to the releases of radioactive materials from the Mayak Production Association. The current follow-up through December 2003 includes individuals exposed on the Techa riverside within the Chelyabinsk and Kurgan oblasts using mortality data, and within the Chelyabinsk oblast using incidence data. The analysis was performed by means of the biologically based two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model and conventional excess relative risk models. For the mortality and incidence cohorts, central estimates of the excess relative risk per dose of 0.85 Gy(-1) (95% CI 0.36; 1.38) and 0.91 Gy(-1) (95% CI 0.35; 1.52) were found, respectively. For both the mortality and incidence cohorts, the best description of the radiation risk was achieved with the same TSCE model including a lifelong radiation effect on the promotion rate of initiated cells. An increase in the excess risk with attained age was observed, whereas no significant change of risk with age at exposure was seen. Direct comparison of the mortality and incidence cohorts showed that the excess relative risk estimates agreed very well in both cohorts, as did the excess absolute risk and the hazard after correction for the different background rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461395     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-010-0289-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  36 in total

1.  Preliminary uncertainty analysis for the doses estimated using the Techa River dosimetry system--2000.

Authors:  B A Napier; N B Shagina; M O Degteva; E I Tolstykh; M I Vorobiova; L R Anspaugh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Studies on the extended Techa river cohort: cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  M M Kossenko; D L Preston; L Y Krestinina; M O Degteva; N V Startsev; T Thomas; V P Vyushkova; L R Anspaugh; B A Napier; V P Kozheurov; E Ron; A V Akleyev
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Delayed activation of DNA damage checkpoint and radiation-induced genomic instability.

Authors:  Keiji Suzuki; Mitsuaki Ojima; Seiji Kodama; Masami Watanabe
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Stochastic modelling of colon cancer: is there a role for genomic instability?

Authors:  Mark P Little; Guangquan Li
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Age at exposure to ionising radiation and cancer mortality among Hanford workers: follow up through 1994.

Authors:  S Wing; D B Richardson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Analysis of lung cancer incidence in the Nurses' Health and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Studies using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; William D Hazelton; Graham A Colditz; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Radiation-induced genomic instability is associated with DNA methylation changes in cultured human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Sahana Kaup; Valerie Grandjean; Rajarshi Mukherjee; Aparna Kapoor; Edward Keyes; Colin B Seymour; Carmel E Mothersill; Paul N Schofield
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Occupational and environmental radiation and cancer.

Authors:  J D Boice; J H Lubin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Increased chromosome aberration levels in cells from mouse fetuses after zygote X-irradiation.

Authors:  S Pampfer; C Streffer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklöf; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  5 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk in atomic bomb survivors from multi-model inference with incidence data 1958-1998.

Authors:  J C Kaiser; P Jacob; R Meckbach; H M Cullings
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Low-dose ionizing radiation increases the mortality risk of solid cancers in nuclear industry workers: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shu-Gen Qu; Jin Gao; Bo Tang; Bo Yu; Yue-Ping Shen; Yu Tu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-19

3.  Mechanistic study on lung cancer mortality after radon exposure in the Wismut cohort supports important role of clonal expansion in lung carcinogenesis.

Authors:  I Zaballa; M Eidemüller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Lung cancer mortality (1950-1999) among Eldorado uranium workers: a comparison of models of carcinogenesis and empirical excess risk models.

Authors:  Markus Eidemüller; Peter Jacob; Rachel S D Lane; Stanley E Frost; Lydia B Zablotska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cerebrovascular Diseases in Workers at Mayak PA: The Difference in Radiation Risk between Incidence and Mortality.

Authors:  Cristoforo Simonetto; Helmut Schöllnberger; Tamara V Azizova; Evgenia S Grigoryeva; Maria V Pikulina; Markus Eidemüller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.