Literature DB >> 21947564

Breast cancer risk in atomic bomb survivors from multi-model inference with incidence data 1958-1998.

J C Kaiser1, P Jacob, R Meckbach, H M Cullings.   

Abstract

Breast cancer risk from radiation exposure has been analyzed in the cohort of Japanese a-bomb survivors using empirical models and mechanistic two-step clonal expansion (TSCE) models with incidence data from 1958 to 1998. TSCE models rely on a phenomenological representation of cell transition processes on the path to cancer. They describe the data as good as empirical models and this fact has been exploited for risk assessment. Adequate models of both types have been selected with a statistical protocol based on parsimonious parameter deployment and their risk estimates have been combined using multi-model inference techniques. TSCE models relate the radiation risk to cell processes which are controlled by age-increasing rates of initiating mutations and by changes in hormone levels due to menopause. For exposure at young age, they predict an enhanced excess relative risk (ERR) whereas the preferred empirical model shows no dependence on age at exposure. At attained age 70, the multi-model median of the ERR at 1 Gy decreases moderately from 1.2 Gy(-1) (90% CI 0.72; 2.1) for exposure at age 25 to a 30% lower value for exposure at age 55. For cohort strata with few cases, where model predictions diverge, uncertainty intervals from multi-model inference are enhanced by up to a factor of 1.6 compared to the preferred empirical model. Multi-model inference provides a joint risk estimate from several plausible models rather than relying on a single model of choice. It produces more reliable point estimates and improves the characterization of uncertainties. The method is recommended for risk assessment in practical radiation protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947564     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0387-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  35 in total

1.  Incidence of malignant diseases in humans injected with radium-224.

Authors:  Elke Anna Nekolla; Linda Walsh; Heinz Spiess
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Breast cancer risk from different mammography screening practices.

Authors:  Harmen Bijwaard; Alina Brenner; Fieke Dekkers; Teun van Dillen; Charles E Land; John D Boice
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Stochastic modelling of colon cancer: is there a role for genomic instability?

Authors:  Mark P Little; Guangquan Li
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Carcinoma of the breast; results from statistical research.

Authors:  J CLEMMESEN
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1948-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Ovarian steroids and the human breast: regulation of stem cells and cell proliferation.

Authors:  Robert B Clarke
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Two-stage model for carcinogenesis: Epidemiology of breast cancer in females.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; N E Day; R G Stevens
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Possible expressions of radiation-induced genomic instability, bystander effects or low-dose hypersensitivity in cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  Peter Jacob; Reinhard Meckbach; Jan Christian Kaiser; Mikhail Sokolnikov
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  'Hormonal' risk factors, 'breast tissue age' and the age-incidence of breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Pike; M D Krailo; B E Henderson; J T Casagrande; D G Hoel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Aging impacts transcriptomes but not genomes of hormone-dependent breast cancers.

Authors:  Christina Yau; Vita Fedele; Ritu Roydasgupta; Jane Fridlyand; Alan Hubbard; Joe W Gray; Karen Chew; Shanaz H Dairkee; Dan H Moore; Francesco Schittulli; Stefania Tommasi; Angelo Paradiso; Donna G Albertson; Christopher C Benz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Radiation and breast cancer: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  Cécile M Ronckers; Christine A Erdmann; Charles E Land
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  10 in total

1.  Response to "model averaging in the analysis of leukaemia mortality among Japanese A-bomb survivors" by Richardson and Cole.

Authors:  L Walsh; J C Kaiser; H Schöllnberger; P Jacob
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Dose-responses from multi-model inference for the non-cancer disease mortality of atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; J C Kaiser; P Jacob; L Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Mammary Chain Irradiation in Left-Sided Breast Cancer: Can We Reduce the Risk of Secondary Cancer and Ischaemic Heart Disease with Modern Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques?

Authors:  Vanessa Figlia; Cristoforo Simonetto; Markus Eidemüller; Stefania Naccarato; Gianluisa Sicignano; Antonio De Simone; Ruggero Ruggieri; Rosario Mazzola; Christiane Matuschek; Edwin Bölke; Montserrat Pazos; Maximilian Niyazi; Claus Belka; Filippo Alongi; Stefanie Corradini
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.268

4.  Independent analysis of the radiation risk for leukaemia in children and adults with mortality data (1950-2003) of Japanese A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  Jan Christian Kaiser; Linda Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Mechanistic study on lung cancer mortality after radon exposure in the Wismut cohort supports important role of clonal expansion in lung carcinogenesis.

Authors:  I Zaballa; M Eidemüller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  A method for determining weights for excess relative risk and excess absolute risk when applied in the calculation of lifetime risk of cancer from radiation exposure.

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Genomic instability and radiation risk in molecular pathways to colon cancer.

Authors:  Jan Christian Kaiser; Reinhard Meckbach; Peter Jacob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Correlations between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Genetic Instability in Cancer Patients-A Clinical Perspective Study.

Authors:  Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz; Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar; Antonio Luiz Gomes Junior; Keylla da Conceição Machado; Muhammad Torequl Islam; Eunus S Ali; Manik Chandra Shill; Md Iqbal Ahmed; Shaikh Jamal Uddin; Ana Maria Oliveira Ferreira da Mata; Ricardo Melo de Carvalho; Kátia da Conceição Machado; André Luiz Pinho Sobral; Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva; João Marcelo de Castro E Souza; Daniel Dias Rufino Arcanjo; Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira; Siddhartha Kumar Mishra; Juliana da Silva; Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo-Cavalcante
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Dose-responses for mortality from cerebrovascular and heart diseases in atomic bomb survivors: 1950-2003.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Markus Eidemüller; Harry M Cullings; Cristoforo Simonetto; Frauke Neff; Jan Christian Kaiser
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  ProZES: the methodology and software tool for assessment of assigned share of radiation in probability of cancer occurrence.

Authors:  Alexander Ulanowski; Elena Shemiakina; Denise Güthlin; Janine Becker; Dale Preston; A Iulian Apostoaei; F Owen Hoffman; Peter Jacob; Jan Christian Kaiser; Markus Eidemüller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 1.925

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.