Literature DB >> 24967194

Agreement in identification of glaucomatous progression between the optic disc photography and Heidelberg retina tomography in young glaucomatous patients.

Paraskeva Hentova-Sencanic1, Ivan Sencanic2, Goran Trajković3, Marija Bozic1, Nevena Bjelovic4.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate concordance between the clinical assessment of glaucomatous progression of the optic disc photography and progression identified by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) in patients with suspected primary juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG).
METHODS: Optic disc photographs and corresponding HRT II series were reviewed. Optic disc changes between first and final photographs were noted as well as progression identified by HRT topographic change analysis (TCA) and rim area regression line (RARL) Agreement between progression indentified by photography and HRT methods was assessed. Progression, determined from optic disc photographs by consensus assessment was used as the reference standard.
RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (59 eyes) with suspected JOAG were studied. Agreement for progression/no progression between TCA and photography was obtained in 4 progressing eyes and 38 stable eyes (71.19%, k=0.11). Agreement for progression/no progression between RARL and photography was detected in 5 progressing eyes and in 34 stable eyes (66.10%, k=0.15). The number of HRT per patient was statistically higher in the progressing group (P=0.034).
CONCLUSION: Agreement for detection of longitudinal changes between photography and HRT analysis was poor. One way to improve the chance of discovery of the progression could be increasing the number of HRT examinations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heidelberg Retina Tomography; juvenile glaucoma; optic disc

Year:  2014        PMID: 24967194      PMCID: PMC4067662          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  30 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the retinal nerve fiber layer in clinical trials of glaucoma neuroprotection.

Authors:  E Z Blumenthal; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Glaucomatous progression in series of stereoscopic photographs and Heidelberg retina tomograph images.

Authors:  Neil O'Leary; David P Crabb; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Michael D Twa; Michael J Lloyd; Aachal Kotecha; David F Garway-Heath; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05

3.  Optic disc progression in glaucoma: comparison of confocal scanning laser tomography to optic disc photographs in a prospective study.

Authors:  Balwantray C Chauhan; Donna M Hutchison; Paul H Artes; Joseph Caprioli; Jost B Jonas; Raymond P LeBlanc; Marcelo T Nicolela
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Determinants of agreement between the confocal scanning laser tomograph and standardized assessment of glaucomatous progression.

Authors:  Gianmarco Vizzeri; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereophotographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study.

Authors:  John C Ervin; Hans G Lemij; Richard P Mills; Harry A Quigley; Hilary W Thompson; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Agreement between stereophotographic and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy measurements of cup/disc ratio: effect on a predictive model for glaucoma development.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Cristiana Vasile; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Performance of confocal scanning laser tomograph Topographic Change Analysis (TCA) for assessing glaucomatous progression.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Robert N Weinreb; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Luciana M Alencar; Neil O'Leary; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Incidence and rates of visual field progression after longitudinally measured optic disc change in glaucoma.

Authors:  Balwantray C Chauhan; Marcelo T Nicolela; Paul H Artes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  [The 'cup-to-disc ratio': a comparison of TopSS, HRT II and subjective findings].

Authors:  W Hitzl; K Hornykewycz; G Grabner; H A Reitsamer
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.700

10.  Factors predicting the rate of functional progression in early and suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Chris A Johnson; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.