Literature DB >> 20457880

The next generation of molecular markers from massively parallel sequencing of pooled DNA samples.

Andreas Futschik1, Christian Schlötterer.   

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) is about to revolutionize genetic analysis. Currently NGS techniques are mainly used to sequence individual genomes. Due to the high sequence coverage required, the costs for population-scale analyses are still too high to allow an extension to nonmodel organisms. Here, we show that NGS of pools of individuals is often more effective in SNP discovery and provides more accurate allele frequency estimates, even when taking sequencing errors into account. We modify the population genetic estimators Tajima's π and Watterson's to obtain unbiased estimates from NGS pooling data. Given the same sequencing effort, the resulting estimators often show a better performance than those obtained from individual sequencing. Although our analysis also shows that NGS of pools of individuals will not be preferable under all circumstances, it provides a cost-effective approach to estimate allele frequencies on a genome-wide scale.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457880      PMCID: PMC2940288          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.114397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

1.  An analysis of strategies for discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  M A Eberle; L Kruglyak
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation.

Authors:  Richard R Hudson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studies.

Authors:  Pak Sham; Joel S Bader; Ian Craig; Michael O'Donovan; Michael Owen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries.

Authors:  Curtis P Van Tassell; Timothy P L Smith; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Jeremy F Taylor; Robert D Schnabel; Cynthia Taylor Lawley; Christian D Haudenschild; Stephen S Moore; Wesley C Warren; Tad S Sonstegard
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-02-24       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  On the inadmissibility of Watterson's estimator.

Authors:  Andreas Futschik; Florian Gach
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Estimation of nucleotide diversity, disequilibrium coefficients, and mutation rates from high-coverage genome-sequencing projects.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Estimation of allele frequencies from high-coverage genome-sequencing projects.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Population genetic inference from resequencing data.

Authors:  Rong Jiang; Simon Tavaré; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Testing for neutrality in samples with sequencing errors.

Authors:  Guillaume Achaz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Accurate and fast methods to estimate the population mutation rate from error prone sequences.

Authors:  Bjarne Knudsen; Michael M Miyamoto
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  134 in total

1.  Where's the money? Inversions, genes, and the hunt for genomic targets of selection.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Andrew Kern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Ecological genomics of Anopheles gambiae along a latitudinal cline: a population-resequencing approach.

Authors:  Changde Cheng; Bradley J White; Colince Kamdem; Keithanne Mockaitis; Carlo Costantini; Matthew W Hahn; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Neutrality tests for sequences with missing data.

Authors:  Luca Ferretti; Emanuele Raineri; Sebastian Ramos-Onsins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the optimal design of genetic variant discovery studies.

Authors:  Iuliana Ionita-Laza; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08-27

5.  To pool, or not to pool?

Authors:  David J Cutler; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms.

Authors:  R Ekblom; J Galindo
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  A hierarchical Bayesian model for next-generation population genomics.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  SNPGenie: estimating evolutionary parameters to detect natural selection using pooled next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Chase W Nelson; Louise H Moncla; Austin L Hughes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Chromosomal inversions and ecotypic differentiation in Anopheles gambiae: the perspective from whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  R Rebecca Love; Aaron M Steele; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Sékou F Traore; Scott J Emrich; Michael C Fontaine; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 10.  Within-host nucleotide diversity of virus populations: insights from next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Chase W Nelson; Austin L Hughes
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.