Literature DB >> 10877435

Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating.

R W Kortekaas1, P G Stelmachowicz.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine developmental effects in auditory perception of word-final /s/ in inflectional morpheme contexts as a function of high-frequency (HF) bandwidth. Such developmental effects may support the use of hearing aids with extended bandwidths in young children with impaired hearing. The first part of the study consisted of acoustical measurements on word-initial /s/ and inflectional morpheme /s/ in sentences recorded from a male speaker. For this speaker, recordings of inflectional morpheme /s/ on average were approximately 50 ms shorter and about 5 dB lower in level than word-initial /s/ sounds. They also had a lower spectral center of gravity, but not a higher coefficient of kurtosis. The second part consisted of measurements of psychometric functions relating detection of the inflectional morpheme /s/ sounds to HF bandwidth in normally hearing 5-, 7-, and 10-year-old children and adults. In speech-shaped noise, significant main effects of age were found for detection as a function of bandwidth for both the 30- and 10-dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) condition, although there was no interaction between age and SNR condition. The third part consisted of subjective clarity rating as a function of HF bandwidth for the same speech stimuli used in the second part. No differences were found between age groups in the shape of the clarity rating functions, but differences were found in the rating variance. No systematic effects of the spectral composition of inflectional morpheme /s/ sounds on either detection or clarity rating were found. The higher detection thresholds and larger clarity rating variances for the youngest participants support the use of extended high-frequency bandwidths for young children with impaired hearing. The extent to which the potential benefit of extended bandwidths is affected by hearing impairment in this population, however, deserves further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10877435     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4303.645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  15 in total

1.  Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian M Kreisman; Annette G Mazevski; Donald J Schum; Ravichandran Sockalingam
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Rapid word-learning in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  A L Pittman; D E Lewis; B M Hoover; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A randomized controlled trial of nonlinear frequency compression versus conventional processing in hearing aids: speech and language of children at three years of age.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Julia Day; Vicky Zhang; Harvey Dillon; Patricia Van Buynder; Mark Seeto; Sanna Hou; Vivienne Marnane; Jessica Thomson; Laura Street; Angela Wong; Lauren Burns; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Grammatical outcomes of 3- and 6-year-old children who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Keegan M Koehlinger; Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

6.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Two ears and two (or more?) devices: a pediatric case study of bilateral profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Rosalie M Uchanski; Lisa S Davidson; Sharon Quadrizius; Ruth Reeder; Jamie Cadieux; Jerrica Kettel; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

Review 8.  An Introduction to the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss Study.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the perception of word-final plurality markers in children and adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hannah Hodson; Ryan W McCreery; Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths.

Authors:  Andrea L Pittman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.