Literature DB >> 20456705

Biospecimen repositories: are blood donors willing to participate?

Erik A Scott1, Karen S Schlumpf, Sunitha M Mathew, Alan E Mast, Michael P Busch, Jerome L Gottschall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Studies (REDS-I/-II) have conducted epidemiologic, laboratory, and survey research on volunteer blood donors. Some studies request additional permission to store biospecimens for future studies. The representativeness and applicability of studies performed using repositories may be reduced by low participation rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Demographics from subjects consenting to participate in the 2007 REDS-II Leukocyte Antibodies Prevalence Study (LAPS) repository were compared to "study-only" subjects. Data from the 1998 REDS-I survey of donor opinion regarding storage and use of biospecimens were also explored.
RESULTS: Overall, 91% of LAPS subjects agreed to participate in the repository. Odds of repository participation were lower among African American and Hispanic donors, 35- to 44-year-olds, donors who had not completed high school, and donors from one geographic location, regardless of other variables. Survey data from 1998 revealed that 97% of respondents approved of long-term storage of biospecimens, although only 87% indicated that they would personally participate. Many respondents would require notification or their permission be obtained before participation. Minority respondents would require permission or notification more often and were less certain they would personally participate in a repository.
CONCLUSION: Blood donors are quite willing to participate in biospecimen repositories. Regional differences and lower odds of participation in the minority blood donor population may result in a reduced number of biospecimens available for study and a decreased ability to definitely answer specific research questions in these populations.
© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456705      PMCID: PMC2990341          DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02667.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  24 in total

1.  Motivations to donate blood: demographic comparisons.

Authors:  Simone A Glynn; Steven H Kleinman; George B Schreiber; Thomas Zuck; Suzanne Mc Combs; James Bethel; George Garratty; Alan E Williams
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Repeat whole-blood and plateletpheresis donors:unreported deferrable risks, reactive screening tests, andresponse to incentive programs.

Authors:  S A Glynn; J W Smith; G B Schreiber; S H Kleinman; C C Nass; J Bethel; B Biswas; R A Thomson; A E Williams
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Blood-donor perceptions of health history screening with a computer-assisted self-administered interview.

Authors:  Ana M Sanchez; George B Schreiber; Simone A Glynn; James Bethel; Debra Kessler; David Chang; Thomas F Zuck
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and screening in United States blood donors.

Authors:  U K Sharma; G B Schreiber; S A Glynn; C C Nass; M J Higgins; Y Tu; J Bethel; A E Williams
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Charles F Lynch; Leon F Burmeister
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Analysis of HBV infection after blood transfusion in Japan through investigation of a comprehensive donor specimen repository.

Authors:  C Matsumoto; K Tadokoro; K Fujimura; S Hirakawa; S Mitsunaga; T Juji
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Racial and ethnic composition of volunteer cord blood donors: comparison with volunteer unrelated marrow donors.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; Julie Hicks; Bernie Dharan; Daniel Ambruso; Kenneth Anderson; Celso Bianco; Lynn Bemiller; William Dickey; Richard Lottenberg; Mary O'Neill; Mark Popovsky; Donna Skerrett; Irena Sniecinski; John R Wingard
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Mammalian brain consumption by blood donors in the United States: brains today, deferred tomorrow?

Authors:  George B Schreiber; Ana M Sanchez; George Garratty; Catharie C Nass; Yongling Tu; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  The effect of previous pregnancy and transfusion on HLA alloimmunization in blood donors: implications for a transfusion-related acute lung injury risk reduction strategy.

Authors:  Darrell J Triulzi; Steven Kleinman; Ram M Kakaiya; Michael P Busch; Philip J Norris; Whitney R Steele; Simone A Glynn; Christopher D Hillyer; Patricia Carey; Jerome L Gottschall; Edward L Murphy; Jorge A Rios; Paul M Ness; David J Wright; Danielle Carrick; George B Schreiber
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment.

Authors:  Simone A Glynn; Alan E Williams; Catharie C Nass; James Bethel; Debra Kessler; Edward P Scott; Joy Fridey; Steven H Kleinman; George B Schreiber
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  18 in total

1.  Considerations for bio-specimen collection among black women residing in the rural Deep South participating in a cancer prevention study.

Authors:  Tiffany L Carson; Claudia M Hardy; Eva Greene; Pamela L Carter; Glenda James; Edward E Partridge; Monica L Baskin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-15

2.  Educating Hispanics About Clinical Trials and Biobanking.

Authors:  M Lizette Rangel; Natalia I Heredia; Belinda Reininger; Lorna McNeill; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Ethical and deontological issues in Transfusion Medicine.

Authors:  Dario Sacchini; Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Gennaro Bruno; Chiara Liumbruno; Daniela Rafanelli; Roberta Minacori; Pietro Refolo; Antonio G Spagnolo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Community Perceptions of Biobanking Participation: A Qualitative Study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities.

Authors:  Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Larkin L Strong; Laura Von Hatten; Lynne Nguyen; Belinda M Reininger; Lorna H McNeill; María E Fernández
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Biospecimen donation among black and white breast cancer survivors: opportunities to promote precision medicine.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Yun-Ling Zheng; Ying Wang; Kristi D Graves; Tania Lobo; Hanfei Xu; Yvonne Jennings; Dennis Tolsma; Martha Trout; Brandi E Robinson; Brittany McKinnon; Mahlet Tadesse
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Association of acculturation, nativity, and years living in the United States with biobanking among individuals of Mexican descent.

Authors:  David S Lopez; Maria E Fernandez; Miguel Angel Cano; Claudia Mendez; Chu-Lin Tsai; David W Wetter; Sara S Strom
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Impact of a biospecimen collection seminar on willingness to donate biospecimens among Chinese Americans: results from a randomized, controlled community-based trial.

Authors:  Elisa K Tong; Lei-Chun Fung; Susan L Stewart; Debora A Paterniti; Julie H T Dang; Moon S Chen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Factors that affect willingness to donate blood for the purpose of biospecimen research in the Korean American community.

Authors:  Glorian P Yen; Adam Davey; Grace X Ma
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Genetic research in the blood bank: acceptability to Northern California donors.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Brian S Custer; Daniel A Hindes; Nora V Hirschler; Kim-Anh Nguyen; Michael P Busch; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women.

Authors:  Katherine M Brown; Bettina F Drake; Sarah Gehlert; Leslie E Wolf; James DuBois; Joann Seo; Krista Woodward; Hannah Perkins; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.