BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood is an alternative peripheral blood progenitor cell source for patients who need transplantation. A presumed advantage of cord blood is the ability to increase minority recruitment. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The racial composition of five member cord blood banks of the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) was compared, representing 9020 cord blood donors with NMDP marrow donors from comparable geographic areas, representing 417,676 donors. Cord blood and marrow donors self-reported racial designations on questionnaires. Donor statistics were compared with baseline racial data of deliveries from participating hospitals for cord blood donors and with geographic census data for marrow donors. RESULTS: The California, Florida, and Massachusetts cord blood banks recruited a lower percentage of minorities than the corresponding marrow donor centers. In New York and Colorado, minority recruitment was equivalent. In California, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York, the cord blood banks recruited a lower percentage of minorities than those delivering at the respective hospitals. The cord blood banks in California, Colorado, Florida, and Massachusetts recruited a lower percentage of minorities compared with delivery data than the corresponding marrow donor centers compared with census population (p < 0.001). In New York, the percentages were similar. CONCLUSION: The problem of insufficient minority recruitment of cord blood has not yet been solved. Better strategies are needed to recruit minority donors.
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood is an alternative peripheral blood progenitor cell source for patients who need transplantation. A presumed advantage of cord blood is the ability to increase minority recruitment. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The racial composition of five member cord blood banks of the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) was compared, representing 9020 cord blood donors with NMDP marrow donors from comparable geographic areas, representing 417,676 donors. Cord blood and marrow donors self-reported racial designations on questionnaires. Donor statistics were compared with baseline racial data of deliveries from participating hospitals for cord blood donors and with geographic census data for marrow donors. RESULTS: The California, Florida, and Massachusetts cord blood banks recruited a lower percentage of minorities than the corresponding marrow donor centers. In New York and Colorado, minority recruitment was equivalent. In California, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York, the cord blood banks recruited a lower percentage of minorities than those delivering at the respective hospitals. The cord blood banks in California, Colorado, Florida, and Massachusetts recruited a lower percentage of minorities compared with delivery data than the corresponding marrow donor centers compared with census population (p < 0.001). In New York, the percentages were similar. CONCLUSION: The problem of insufficient minority recruitment of cord blood has not yet been solved. Better strategies are needed to recruit minority donors.
Authors: Erik A Scott; Karen S Schlumpf; Sunitha M Mathew; Alan E Mast; Michael P Busch; Jerome L Gottschall Journal: Transfusion Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Karen K Ballen; John P Klein; Tanya L Pedersen; Deepika Bhatla; Reggie Duerst; Joanne Kurtzberg; Hillard M Lazarus; Charles F LeMaistre; Phillip McCarthy; Paulette Mehta; Jeanne Palmer; Michelle Setterholm; John R Wingard; Steven Joffe; Susan K Parsons; Galen E Switzer; Stephanie J Lee; J Douglas Rizzo; Navneet S Majhail Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christopher A Loffredo; Gheorghe Luta; Sherrie Wallington; Solomon B Makgoeng; Claire Selsky; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Lucile L Adams-Campbell Journal: J Community Health Date: 2013-08
Authors: Wolfram Goessling; Robyn S Allen; Xiao Guan; Ping Jin; Naoya Uchida; Michael Dovey; James M Harris; Mark E Metzger; Aylin C Bonifacino; David Stroncek; Joseph Stegner; Myriam Armant; Thorsten Schlaeger; John F Tisdale; Leonard I Zon; Robert E Donahue; Trista E North Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Edward L Murphy; Beth Shaz; Christopher D Hillyer; Patricia Carey; Brian S Custer; Nora Hirschler; Junyong Fang; George B Schreiber Journal: Transfusion Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 3.157