BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) has been shown to promote disclosures of sensitive information. Using CASI to screen blood-donor candidates might encourage reports of deferrable risks without discouraging eligible donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 1998, an anonymous mail survey was sent to donors from eight blood centers. The relationship of donor demographics, donation history, and infectious risks (HIV test-seeking behavior, unreported deferrable risk, or reactive donor-screening test result) on attitudes toward CASI were assessed. RESULTS: Of 92,581 blood donors surveyed, 52,650 (57%) responded; of these, 4713 (7%) had an infectious risk. Among donors with risks, 29 percent felt they would be encouraged to reveal personal data, and 7 percent reported they would be discouraged from donating by CASI. Young, minority, female, and first-time donors were the most likely to report that CASI would encourage personal disclosures. Among donors without risks, 5 percent felt CASI would discourage them from donating. CONCLUSIONS: Although most donors felt their donation practices would not be influenced, CASI might reduce the proportion of donors with infectious risks by fostering personal disclosures and self-deferrals. The potential for CASI to improve donor screening and increase appropriate self-deferrals should be balanced against the possible loss of reluctant safe donors.
BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) has been shown to promote disclosures of sensitive information. Using CASI to screen blood-donor candidates might encourage reports of deferrable risks without discouraging eligible donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 1998, an anonymous mail survey was sent to donors from eight blood centers. The relationship of donor demographics, donation history, and infectious risks (HIV test-seeking behavior, unreported deferrable risk, or reactive donor-screening test result) on attitudes toward CASI were assessed. RESULTS: Of 92,581 blood donors surveyed, 52,650 (57%) responded; of these, 4713 (7%) had an infectious risk. Among donors with risks, 29 percent felt they would be encouraged to reveal personal data, and 7 percent reported they would be discouraged from donating by CASI. Young, minority, female, and first-time donors were the most likely to report that CASI would encourage personal disclosures. Among donors without risks, 5 percent felt CASI would discourage them from donating. CONCLUSIONS: Although most donors felt their donation practices would not be influenced, CASI might reduce the proportion of donors with infectious risks by fostering personal disclosures and self-deferrals. The potential for CASI to improve donor screening and increase appropriate self-deferrals should be balanced against the possible loss of reluctant safe donors.
Authors: Erik A Scott; Karen S Schlumpf; Sunitha M Mathew; Alan E Mast; Michael P Busch; Jerome L Gottschall Journal: Transfusion Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Giuseppina Maria Patavino; Cesar de Almeida-Neto; Jing Liu; David J Wright; Alfredo Mendrone-Junior; Maria Inês Lopes Ferreira; Anna Bárbara de Freitas Carneiro; Brian Custer; João Eduardo Ferreira; Michael P Busch; Ester Cerdeira Sabino Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: C de Almeida-Neto; T T Goncalez; R J Birch; S M F de Carvalho; L Capuani; S C Leão; C Miranda; P C Rocha; A B Carneiro-Proietti; B R Johnson; D J Wright; E L Murphy; B Custer Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: Tassila Salomon; Isabel Gomes; Mina Cintho Ozahata; Carlos Henrique Valente Moreira; Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira; Thelma T Gonçalez; Maria Esther Duarte; Carolina Miranda; Anna Bárbara Carneiro Proietti; Ester Sabino; Cesar de Almeida Neto; Brian Custer Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz; Walter H Curioso; Marco A Gonzales; Wilfredo Evangelista; Jesus M Castagnetto; Cesar P Carcamo; James P Hughes; Patricia J Garcia; Geoffrey P Garnett; King K Holmes Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 2.796