BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many acne grading methods exist; however, there is no agreed-upon standard. Our objective was to create and validate a reproducible acne assessment scale for rating the severity of juvenile facial acne suitable for use in France and Europe. METHODS: The scale we created described the different types of acne lesions in a manner similar to global assessment scales used in clinical trials. The scale was then validated by seven expert dermatologists in the field of acne [the Global Evaluation Acne (GEA) group] first on 34 photographic cases of Caucasian acne patients and second by clinical examination of 22 acne patients. RESULTS: There was good agreement in Investigators' assessments of acne both on photographs and patients (R = 0.8057; P < 0.0001, and R = 0.8437; P = 0.0015). CONCLUSION: The GEA Scale is a global scale validated both on photographs and acne patients which can be used either in clinical research or by the dermatologist in his office. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many acne grading methods exist; however, there is no agreed-upon standard. Our objective was to create and validate a reproducible acne assessment scale for rating the severity of juvenile facial acne suitable for use in France and Europe. METHODS: The scale we created described the different types of acne lesions in a manner similar to global assessment scales used in clinical trials. The scale was then validated by seven expert dermatologists in the field of acne [the Global Evaluation Acne (GEA) group] first on 34 photographic cases of Caucasian acne patients and second by clinical examination of 22 acne patients. RESULTS: There was good agreement in Investigators' assessments of acne both on photographs and patients (R = 0.8057; P < 0.0001, and R = 0.8437; P = 0.0015). CONCLUSION: The GEA Scale is a global scale validated both on photographs and acne patients which can be used either in clinical research or by the dermatologist in his office. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Authors: Peter Theut Riis; Ditte Marie Saunte; Viktoria Sigsgaard; Axel Patrice Villani; Philippe Guillem; José C Pascual; Naomi N Kappe; Annika M J D Vanlaerhoven; Hessel H van der Zee; Errol P Prens; Moetaz El-Domyati; Hossam Abdel-Wahab; Nayera Moftah; Rania Abdelghani; Eugenia Agut-Busquet; Jorge Romaní; Carol Hlela; Lerinza van den Worm; Vincenzo Bettoli; Giada Calamo; Mehmet Ali Gürer; Burcu Beksaç; Lukasz Matusiak; Amelia Glowaczewska; Jacek C Szepietowski; Lennart Emtestam; Jan Lapins; Hassan Riad Kottb; Mohammad Fatani; Lisa Weibel; Martin Theiler; Maïa Delage-Toriel; Thi Thanh Hong Lam; Aude Nassif; Pierre-Andre Becherel; Mateja Dolenc-Voljc; Nejib Doss; Dorra Bouazzi; Farida Benhadou; Veronique Del Marmol; Gregor B E Jemec Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Elena Bernardis; Haochang Shou; John S Barbieri; Patrick J McMahon; Marissa J Perman; Leigh Ann Rola; Jenna L Streicher; James R Treat; Leslie Castelo-Soccio; Albert C Yan Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Olga Lekakh; Anne Marie Mahoney; Karlee Novice; Julia Kamalpour; Azeen Sadeghian; Dana Mondo; Cathy Kalnicky; Rong Guo; Anthony Peterson; Rebecca Tung Journal: J Lasers Med Sci Date: 2015-10-27
Authors: Sorel Fitz-Gibbon; Shuta Tomida; Bor-Han Chiu; Lin Nguyen; Christine Du; Minghsun Liu; David Elashoff; Marie C Erfe; Anya Loncaric; Jenny Kim; Robert L Modlin; Jeff F Miller; Erica Sodergren; Noah Craft; George M Weinstock; Huiying Li Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2013-01-21 Impact factor: 8.551