Elena Bernardis1, Haochang Shou2, John S Barbieri1, Patrick J McMahon1,3,4, Marissa J Perman1,3,4, Leigh Ann Rola1,3,4, Jenna L Streicher1,3,4, James R Treat1,3,4, Leslie Castelo-Soccio1,3,4, Albert C Yan1,3,4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Division of Pediatrics, Section of Dermatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: The qualitative grading of acne is important for routine clinical care and clinical trials, and although many useful systems exist, no single acne global grading system has had universal acceptance. In addition, many current instruments focus primarily on evaluating primary lesions (eg, comedones, papules, and nodules) or exclusively on signs of secondary change (eg, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, scarring). Objectives: To develop and validate an acne global grading system that provides a comprehensive evaluation of primary lesions and secondary changes due to acne. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study created a multidimensional acne severity feature space by analyzing decision patterns of pediatric dermatologists evaluating acne. Modeling acne severity patterns based on visual image features was then performed to reduce dimensionality of the feature space to a novel 2-dimensional grading system, in which severity levels are functions of multidimensional acne cues. The system was validated by 6 clinicians on a new set of images. All images used in this study were taken from a retrospective, longitudinal data set of 150 patients diagnosed with acne, ranging across the entire pediatric population (aged 0-21 years), excluding images with any disagreement on their diagnosis, and selected to adequately span the range of acne types encountered in the clinic. Data were collected from July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2013, and analyzed from March 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prediction performance was evaluated as the mean square error (MSE) with the clinicians' scores. Results: The scale was constructed using acne visual features and treatment decisions of 6 pediatric dermatologists evaluating 145 images of patients with acne ranging in age from 0 to 21 years. Using the proposed scale to predict the severity scores on a new set of 40 images achieved an overall MSE of 0.821, which is smaller than the mean within-clinician differences (MSE of 0.998). Conclusions and Relevance: By integrating primary lesions and secondary changes, this novel acne global grading scale provides a more clinically relevant evaluation of acne that may be used for routine clinical care and clinical trials. Because the severity scores are based on actual clinical practice, this scoring system is also highly correlated with appropriate treatment choices.
Importance: The qualitative grading of acne is important for routine clinical care and clinical trials, and although many useful systems exist, no single acne global grading system has had universal acceptance. In addition, many current instruments focus primarily on evaluating primary lesions (eg, comedones, papules, and nodules) or exclusively on signs of secondary change (eg, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, scarring). Objectives: To develop and validate an acne global grading system that provides a comprehensive evaluation of primary lesions and secondary changes due to acne. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study created a multidimensional acne severity feature space by analyzing decision patterns of pediatric dermatologists evaluating acne. Modeling acne severity patterns based on visual image features was then performed to reduce dimensionality of the feature space to a novel 2-dimensional grading system, in which severity levels are functions of multidimensional acne cues. The system was validated by 6 clinicians on a new set of images. All images used in this study were taken from a retrospective, longitudinal data set of 150 patients diagnosed with acne, ranging across the entire pediatric population (aged 0-21 years), excluding images with any disagreement on their diagnosis, and selected to adequately span the range of acne types encountered in the clinic. Data were collected from July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2013, and analyzed from March 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prediction performance was evaluated as the mean square error (MSE) with the clinicians' scores. Results: The scale was constructed using acne visual features and treatment decisions of 6 pediatric dermatologists evaluating 145 images of patients with acne ranging in age from 0 to 21 years. Using the proposed scale to predict the severity scores on a new set of 40 images achieved an overall MSE of 0.821, which is smaller than the mean within-clinician differences (MSE of 0.998). Conclusions and Relevance: By integrating primary lesions and secondary changes, this novel acne global grading scale provides a more clinically relevant evaluation of acne that may be used for routine clinical care and clinical trials. Because the severity scores are based on actual clinical practice, this scoring system is also highly correlated with appropriate treatment choices.
Authors: B Dréno; F Poli; H Pawin; C Beylot; M Faure; M Chivot; N Auffret; D Moyse; F Ballanger; J Revuz Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: P E Pochi; A R Shalita; J S Strauss; S B Webster; W J Cunliffe; H I Katz; A M Kligman; J J Leyden; D P Lookingbill; G Plewig Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Andrea L Zaenglein; Arun L Pathy; Bethanee J Schlosser; Ali Alikhan; Hilary E Baldwin; Diane S Berson; Whitney P Bowe; Emmy M Graber; Julie C Harper; Sewon Kang; Jonette E Keri; James J Leyden; Rachel V Reynolds; Nanette B Silverberg; Linda F Stein Gold; Megha M Tollefson; Jonathan S Weiss; Nancy C Dolan; Andrew A Sagan; Mackenzie Stern; Kevin M Boyer; Reva Bhushan Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Chante Karimkhani; Robert P Dellavalle; Luc E Coffeng; Carsten Flohr; Roderick J Hay; Sinéad M Langan; Elaine O Nsoesie; Alize J Ferrari; Holly E Erskine; Jonathan I Silverberg; Theo Vos; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Jerry Tan; Andrew Alexis; Hilary Baldwin; Stefan Beissert; Vincenzo Bettoli; James Del Rosso; Brigitte Dréno; Linda Stein Gold; Julie Harper; Charles Lynde; Diane Thiboutot; Jonathan Weiss; Alison M Layton Journal: JAAD Int Date: 2021-08-17
Authors: Quan Thanh Huynh; Phuc Hoang Nguyen; Hieu Xuan Le; Lua Thi Ngo; Nhu-Thuy Trinh; Mai Thi-Thanh Tran; Hoan Tam Nguyen; Nga Thi Vu; Anh Tam Nguyen; Kazuma Suda; Kazuhiro Tsuji; Tsuyoshi Ishii; Trung Xuan Ngo; Hoan Thanh Ngo Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-08-03