Literature DB >> 20455923

Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? New insights from individual-based simulations.

Jon R Bridle1, Jitka Polechová, Masakado Kawata, Roger K Butlin.   

Abstract

All species are restricted in their distribution. Currently, ecological models can only explain such limits if patches vary in quality, leading to asymmetrical dispersal, or if genetic variation is too low at the margins for adaptation. However, population genetic models suggest that the increase in genetic variance resulting from dispersal should allow adaptation to almost any ecological gradient. Clearly therefore, these models miss something that prevents evolution in natural populations. We developed an individual-based simulation to explore stochastic effects in these models. At high carrying capacities, our simulations largely agree with deterministic predictions. However, when carrying capacity is low, the population fails to establish for a wide range of parameter values where adaptation was expected from previous models. Stochastic or transient effects appear critical around the boundaries in parameter space between simulation behaviours. Dispersal, gradient steepness, and population density emerge as key factors determining adaptation on an ecological gradient.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20455923     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01442.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  44 in total

1.  Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments.

Authors:  Robert D Holt; Michael Barfield
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Climate change and evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mutation accumulation and the formation of range limits.

Authors:  Roslyn C Henry; Kamil A Bartoń; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Invasion waves and pinning in the Kirkpatrick-Barton model of evolutionary range dynamics.

Authors:  Judith R Miller
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Evolutionary rescue by beneficial mutations in environments that change in space and time.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Stephan Peischl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Range limits in spatially explicit models of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Judith R Miller; Huihui Zeng
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Pollen dispersal slows geographical range shift and accelerates ecological niche shift under climate change.

Authors:  Robin Aguilée; Gaël Raoul; François Rousset; Ophélie Ronce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  An overview of agent-based models in plant biology and ecology.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Donald L DeAngelis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Divergent selection and heterogeneous migration rates across the range of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis).

Authors:  Jason A Holliday; Haktan Suren; Sally N Aitken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.