Literature DB >> 21264647

Contributions of the nucleus accumbens and its subregions to different aspects of risk-based decision making.

Colin M Stopper1, Stan B Floresco.   

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) has been implicated in mediating different forms of decision making in humans and animals. In the present study, we observed that inactivation of the rat NAc, via infusion of GABA agonists, reduced preference for a large/risky option and increased response latencies on a probabilistic discounting task. Discrete inactivations of the NAc shell and core revealed further differences between these regions in mediating choice and response latencies, respectively. The effect on choice was attributable to reduced win-stay performance (i.e., choosing risky after a being rewarded for a risky choice on a preceding trial). Moreover, NAc inactivation altered choice only when the large/risky option had greater long-term value, in terms of the amount of food that could be obtained over multiple trials relative to the small/certain option. Inactivation of the NAc or the shell subregion also slightly reduced preference for larger rewards on a reward magnitude discrimination. Thus, the NAc seems to play a small role in biasing choice toward larger rewards, but its contribution to behavior is amplified when delivery of these rewards is uncertain, helping to direct response selection toward more favorable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264647     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-010-0015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  52 in total

1.  Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  S Mobini; S Body; M-Y Ho; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Phasic nucleus accumbens dopamine release encodes effort- and delay-related costs.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Joshua L Jones; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  The neural basis of financial risk taking.

Authors:  Camelia M Kuhnen; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Prefrontostriatal circuitry regulates effort-related decision making.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hauber; Susanne Sommer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Characteristics of basolateral amygdala neuronal firing on a spatial memory task involving differential reward.

Authors:  W E Pratt; S J Mizumori
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Regional and temporal differences in real-time dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens during free-choice novelty.

Authors:  G V Rebec; J R Christensen; C Guerra; M T Bardo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Differential effects of dopaminergic manipulations on risky choice.

Authors:  Jennifer R St Onge; Yu Chi Chiu; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  The "two-headed" latent inhibition model of schizophrenia: modeling positive and negative symptoms and their treatment.

Authors:  Ina Weiner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Contrasting roles of basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in impulsive choice.

Authors:  Catharine A Winstanley; David E H Theobald; Rudolf N Cardinal; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Dopaminergic regulation of limbic-striatal interplay.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.186

View more
  73 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiology of Reward-Guided Behavior: Correlates Related to Predictions, Value, Motivation, Errors, Attention, and Action.

Authors:  Gregory B Bissonette; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

2.  Age differences in strategy selection and risk preference during risk-based decision making.

Authors:  Rachel D Samson; Anu Venkatesh; Adam W Lester; A Tobias Weinstein; Peter Lipa; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Anabolic-androgenic steroids and decision making: Probability and effort discounting in male rats.

Authors:  Kathryn G Wallin; Jasmin M Alves; Ruth I Wood
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  δ-opioid and dopaminergic processes in accumbens shell modulate the cholinergic control of predictive learning and choice.

Authors:  Vincent Laurent; Jesus Bertran-Gonzalez; Billy C Chieng; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditions.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Juraj Koci; Yoonseong Park
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Dopaminergic circuitry and risk/reward decision making: implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Colin M Stopper; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Anabolic-androgenic steroids and cognitive effort discounting in male rats.

Authors:  Lisa B Dokovna; Grace Li; Ruth I Wood
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Noradrenergic modulation of risk/reward decision making.

Authors:  David R Montes; Colin M Stopper; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The Abused Inhalant Toluene Impairs Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity and Risk/Reward Decision-Making during a Probabilistic Discounting Task.

Authors:  Kevin M Braunscheidel; Michael P Okas; Michaela Hoffman; Patrick J Mulholland; Stan B Floresco; John J Woodward
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Ventromedial prefrontal area 14 provides opposing regulation of threat and reward-elicited responses in the common marmoset.

Authors:  Zuzanna M Stawicka; Roohollah Massoudi; Nicole K Horst; Ken Koda; Philip L R Gaskin; Laith Alexander; Andrea M Santangelo; Lauren McIver; Gemma J Cockcroft; Christian M Wood; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.