Literature DB >> 27897080

Do perceptions of their partners' childbearing desires affect young women's pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence.

Warren B Miller1, Jennifer S Barber2, Paul Schulz2.   

Abstract

We explore whether young women's perceptions of their sexual partners' childbearing desires contribute to their risk of pregnancy. We used weekly journal data collected from 787 young women to measure their childbearing desires and their perceptions of their partners' childbearing desires. We then conducted hazard modelling to predict pregnancy risk with variables based on interactions between the women's desires and their perceived partners' desires. Models that include perceived partners' desires perform better than one based on women's desires alone. The best model contains three significant predictors: one confirms the importance of pronatal, ambivalent, and indifferent desires for pregnancy risk; one indicates that the perceived partners' antinatal desires reduce women's pregnancy risk; and one suggests that women who both perceive their partners accurately and are in agreement with them have a lower pregnancy risk. The results indicate that perceived partner data can improve prediction and enhance our understanding of pregnancy risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy of perception; ambivalence; antinatalism; childbearing desires; indifference; partner agreement; perception of partner; pregnancy risk; pronatalism; unplanned pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27897080      PMCID: PMC5315631          DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2016.1253858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)        ISSN: 0032-4728


  20 in total

1.  Inside the mind reader's tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference.

Authors:  Daniel R Ames
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-09

Review 2.  Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jordan M Robbins; Joachim I Krueger
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2005

3.  Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Patricia A Lohr; Melanie A Gold; Barbara Gerbert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Susheela Singh; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2007-06

5.  Adolescent childbearing ambivalence: is it the sum of its parts?

Authors:  Jeanelle Sheeder; Stephanie B Teal; Lori A Crane; Catherine Stevens-Simon
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-05       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Pregnancy motivations and contraceptive use: hers, his, or theirs?

Authors:  Joan Marie Kraft; S Marie Harvey; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy; Linda Beckman; Sherry L Farr; Denise J Jamieson; Sheryl Thorburn
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

7.  Understanding the complexity of ambivalence toward pregnancy: does it predict inconsistent use of contraception?

Authors:  Sam Hyun Yoo; Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2014

8.  Proportional hazards models for current status data: application to the study of differentials in age at weaning in Pakistan.

Authors:  I D Diamond; J W McDonald; I H Shah
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1986-11

9.  Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Ronna A Popkin; John S Santelli
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-10-10

10.  Social projection of transient drive states.

Authors:  Leaf Van Boven; George Loewenstein
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  The Dynamics of Intimate Partner Violence and the Risk of Pregnancy during the Transition to Adulthood.

Authors:  Jennifer S Barber; Yasamin Kusunoki; Heather Gatny; Jamie Budnick
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2018-09-07

2.  Norms and stigma around unintended pregnancy in Alabama: Associations with recent contraceptive use and dual method use among young women.

Authors:  Whitney S Rice; Bulent Turan; Kari White; Janet M Turan
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2018-01-15

3.  Dimensions of Reproductive Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Unintended Childbearing Among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford; Vanessa Wanner Lang; Hsueh-Sheng Wu; Jennifer Barber; Yasamin Kusunoki
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2019-02

4.  The utility of a follow-up interview for respondents to a longitudinal survey with frequent measurement.

Authors:  James Wagner; Mick P Couper; William G Axinn; Heather Gatny
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2019-05-04

5.  MEDIATION MODELS OF PREGNANCY DESIRES AND UNPLANNED PREGNANCY IN YOUNG, UNMARRIED WOMEN.

Authors:  Warren B Miller; Jennifer S Barber; Heather H Gatny
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2017-06-05

6.  How Nearby Homicides Affect Young Women's Pregnancy Desires: Evidence From a Quasi-Experiment.

Authors:  Abigail Weitzman; Jennifer S Barber; Justin Heinze; Marc Zimmerman
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-06-01

7.  Pathways to Parenthood in Social and Family Context: Decade in Review, 2020.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05

8.  Fertility intentions and child health in India: Women's use of health services, breastfeeding, and official birth documentation following an unwanted birth.

Authors:  Esha Chatterjee; Christie Sennott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Shedding light on attitudes towards pregnancy among Inuit adolescents from Nunavik.

Authors:  Caroline Moisan; Richard Bélanger; Sarah Fraser; Gina Muckle
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.228

10.  Changes in pregnancy desire after a pregnancy scare in a random sample of young adult women in a Michigan county.

Authors:  Jennifer S Barber; Anne Clark; Heather Gatny
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.