Literature DB >> 20448838

Nonparametric Prediction in Measurement Error Models.

Raymond J Carroll1, Aurore Delaigle, Peter Hall.   

Abstract

Predicting the value of a variable Y corresponding to a future value of an explanatory variable X, based on a sample of previously observed independent data pairs (X(1), Y(1)), …, (X(n), Y(n)) distributed like (X, Y), is very important in statistics. In the error-free case, where X is observed accurately, this problem is strongly related to that of standard regression estimation, since prediction of Y can be achieved via estimation of the regression curve E(Y|X). When the observed X(i)s and the future observation of X are measured with error, prediction is of a quite different nature. Here, if T denotes the future (contaminated) available version of X, prediction of Y can be achieved via estimation of E(Y|T). In practice, estimating E(Y|T) can be quite challenging, as data may be collected under different conditions, making the measurement errors on X(i) and X non-identically distributed. We take up this problem in the nonparametric setting and introduce estimators which allow a highly adaptive approach to smoothing. Reflecting the complexity of the problem, optimal rates of convergence of estimators can vary from the semiparametric n(-1/2) rate to much slower rates that are characteristic of nonparametric problems. Nevertheless, we are able to develop highly adaptive, data-driven methods that achieve very good performance in practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20448838      PMCID: PMC2864536          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm07543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  6 in total

1.  Validation of the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Survey Cohort Food Frequency Questionnaire.

Authors:  E W Flagg; R J Coates; E E Calle; N Potischman; M J Thun
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Estimation of an errors-in-variables regression model when the variances of the measurement errors vary between the observations.

Authors:  S B Kulathinal; Kari Kuulasmaa; Dario Gasbarra
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.

Authors:  Victor Kipnis; Amy F Subar; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Richard P Troiano; Sheila Bingham; Dale A Schoeller; Arthur Schatzkin; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A Design-Adaptive Local Polynomial Estimator for the Errors-in-Variables Problem.

Authors:  Aurore Delaigle; Jianqing Fan; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Within- and between-cohort variation in measured macronutrient intakes, taking account of measurement errors, in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrari; Rudolf Kaaks; Michael T Fahey; Nadia Slimani; Nicholas E Day; Guillem Pera; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Andrew Roddam; Heiner Boeing; Gabriele Nagel; Anne Thiebaut; Philippos Orfanos; Vittorio Krogh; Tonje Braaten; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The evaluation of the diet/disease relation in the EPIC study: considerations for the calibration and the disease models.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrari; Nicholas E Day; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Andrew Roddam; Kurt Hoffmann; Anne Thiébaut; Guillem Pera; Kim Overvad; Eiliv Lund; Antonia Trichopoulou; Rosario Tumino; Bo Gullberg; Teresa Norat; Nadia Slimani; Rudolf Kaaks; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-06       Impact factor: 7.196

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Deconvolution Estimation in Measurement Error Models: The R Package decon.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Wang; Bin Wang
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.440

2.  Varying Coefficient Models for Sparse Noise-contaminated Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Damla Şentürk; Danh V Nguyen
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.261

3.  The impact of covariate measurement error on risk prediction.

Authors:  Polyna Khudyakov; Malka Gorfine; David Zucker; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Impact of climate change on ambient ozone level and mortality in southeastern United States.

Authors:  Howard H Chang; Jingwen Zhou; Montserrat Fuentes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Linear Model Selection when Covariates Contain Errors.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Haiying Wang; Yanyuan Ma; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Strong Relationships in Acid-Base Chemistry - Modeling Protons Based on Predictable Concentrations of Strong Ions, Total Weak Acid Concentrations, and pCO2.

Authors:  Troels Ring; John A Kellum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.