Literature DB >> 20446816

Mouse embryonic stem cells, but not somatic cells, predominantly use homologous recombination to repair double-strand DNA breaks.

Elisia D Tichy1, Resmi Pillai, Li Deng, Li Liang, Jay Tischfield, Sandy J Schwemberger, George F Babcock, Peter J Stambrook.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells give rise to all cell types of an organism. Since mutations at this embryonic stage would affect all cells and be detrimental to the overall health of an organism, robust mechanisms must exist to ensure that genomic integrity is maintained. To test this proposition, we compared the capacity of murine ES cells to repair DNA double-strand breaks with that of differentiated cells. Of the 2 major pathways that repair double-strand breaks, error-prone nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) predominated in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, whereas the high fidelity homologous recombinational repair (HRR) predominated in ES cells. Microhomology-mediated end joining, an emerging repair pathway, persisted at low levels in all cell types examined. The levels of proteins involved in HRR and microhomology-mediated end joining were highly elevated in ES cells compared with mouse embryonic fibroblasts, whereas those for NHEJ were quite variable, with DNA Ligase IV expression low in ES cells. The half-life of DNA Ligase IV protein was also low in ES cells. Attempts to increase the abundance of DNA Ligase IV protein by overexpression or inhibition of its degradation, and thereby elevate NHEJ in ES cells, were unsuccessful. When ES cells were induced to differentiate, however, the level of DNA Ligase IV protein increased, as did the capacity to repair by NHEJ. The data suggest that preferential use of HRR rather than NHEJ may lend ES cells an additional layer of genomic protection and that the limited levels of DNA Ligase IV may account for the low level of NHEJ activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20446816      PMCID: PMC3128311          DOI: 10.1089/scd.2010.0058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  74 in total

1.  Low joining efficiency and non-conservative repair of two distant double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Imenne Boubakour-Azzouz; Miria Ricchetti
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-10-26

2.  Ku is involved in cell growth, DNA replication and G1-S transition.

Authors:  Emmanouil Rampakakis; Domenic Di Paola; Maria Zannis-Hadjopoulos
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings.

Authors:  Mitch McVey; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Human embryonic stem cells have enhanced repair of multiple forms of DNA damage.

Authors:  Scott Maynard; Anna Maria Swistowska; Jae Wan Lee; Ying Liu; Su-Ting Liu; Alexandre Bettencourt Da Cruz; Mahendra Rao; Nadja C de Souza-Pinto; Xianmin Zeng; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-08-20

6.  DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Mouse but not human embryonic stem cells are deficient in rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  C A Bañuelos; J P Banáth; S H MacPhail; J Zhao; C A Eaves; M D O'Connor; P M Lansdorp; P L Olive
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-07-03

8.  XLF-Cernunnos promotes DNA ligase IV-XRCC4 re-adenylation following ligation.

Authors:  Enriqueta Riballo; Lisa Woodbine; Thomas Stiff; Sarah A Walker; Aaron A Goodarzi; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Li Liang; Li Deng; Son C Nguyen; Xin Zhao; Christopher D Maulion; Changshun Shao; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle.

Authors:  Maximina H Yun; Kevin Hiom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  75 in total

1.  Filia Is an ESC-Specific Regulator of DNA Damage Response and Safeguards Genomic Stability.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei-Dao Zhang; Ying-Liang Duan; Yong-Qing Lu; Yi-Xian Cun; Chao-Hui Li; Kun Guo; Wen-Hui Nie; Lei Li; Rugang Zhang; Ping Zheng
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  Mismatch and base excision repair proficiency in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy; Li Liang; Li Deng; Jay Tischfield; Sandy Schwemberger; George Babcock; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-02-18

Review 3.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Rad51 regulates cell cycle progression by preserving G2/M transition in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Yoon; Dae-Kwan Kim; Keun Pil Kim; Kyung-Soon Park
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  Mutation frequency dynamics in HPRT locus in culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells correspond to their differentiated counterparts.

Authors:  Miriama Krutá; Monika Šeneklová; Jan Raška; Anton Salykin; Lenka Zerzánková; Martin Pešl; Eva Bártová; Michal Franek; Aneta Baumeisterová; Stanislava Košková; Kai J Neelsen; Aleš Hampl; Petr Dvořák; Vladimír Rotrekl
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 6.  Aneuploidy in stem cells.

Authors:  Jorge Garcia-Martinez; Bjorn Bakker; Klaske M Schukken; Judith E Simon; Floris Foijer
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 7.  DNA repair mechanisms in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Xuemei Fu; Ke Cui; Qiuxiang Yi; Lili Yu; Yang Xu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  Stacking the DEK: from chromatin topology to cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Lisa M Privette Vinnedge; Ferdinand Kappes; Nicolas Nassar; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Crypt base columnar stem cells in small intestines of mice are radioresistant.

Authors:  Guoqiang Hua; Tin Htwe Thin; Regina Feldman; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Hans Clevers; Zvi Fuks; Richard Kolesnick
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  DNA damage responses in human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Olga Momcilovic; Leah Knobloch; Jamie Fornsaglio; Sandra Varum; Charles Easley; Gerald Schatten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.