Literature DB >> 20445470

A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of osteogenic protein-1 in instrumented posterolateral fusions: report on safety and feasibility.

D Delawi1, W J A Dhert, L Rillardon, E Gay, D Prestamburgo, C Garcia-Fernandez, E Guerado, N Specchia, J L C Van Susante, N Verschoor, H M E Quarles van Ufford, F C Oner.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of osteogenic protein (OP)-1 in 1-level lumbar spine instrumented posterolateral fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instrumented posterolateral fusion with the use of autograft is a commonly performed procedure for a variety of spinal disorders. However, harvesting of bone from the iliac crest is associated with complications. A promising alternative for autograft are bone morphogenetic proteins.
METHODS: As part of a larger prospective, randomized, multicenter study, 36 patients were included, who received a 1-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. All patients had a degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis with symptoms of neurologic compression. There were 2 treatment arms: OP-1 combined with locally available bone from laminectomy (OP-1 group) or iliac crest autograft (autograft group). The primary outcome was the fusion rate based on a computed tomography scan after 1-year follow-up. The clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Additionally, the safety of OP-1 was evaluated by comparing the number and severity of adverse events that occurred between both groups.
RESULTS: Using strict criteria, fusion rates of 63% were found in the OP-1 group and 67% in the control group (P = 0.95). There was a decrease in Oswestry scores at subsequent postoperative time points compared with preoperative values (P > 0.001). There were no significant differences in the mean Oswestry scores between the study group and control group at any time point (P = 0.56). No product-related adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that OP-1 combined with locally obtained autograft is a safe and effective alternative for iliac crest autograft in instrumented single-level posterolateral fusions of the lumbar spine. The main advantage of OP-1 is that it avoids morbidity associated with the harvesting of autogenous bone grafts from the iliac crest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20445470     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d3cf28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  2011 AOA Symposium: Tissue Engineering and Tissue Regeneration: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Scott D Boden; Martha M Murray; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Use of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

4.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

5.  Comparison of the use of rhBMP-7 versus iliac crest autograft in single-level lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fubiao Ye; Zhiyuan Zeng; Jianru Wang; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Zhaomin Zheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Jianqiang Ni; Yanping Zheng; Ning Liu; Xin Wang; Xiutong Fang; Rishabh Phukan; Kirkham B Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical Infection after Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis: CT Analysis of Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Pablo Andrés-Cano; Ana Cerván; Miguel Rodríguez-Solera; Jose Antonio Ortega; Natividad Rebollo; Enrique Guerado
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  The future of spine surgery: New horizons in the treatment of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Noojan Kazemi; Laura K Crew; Trent L Tredway
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-19

9.  The use of rhBMP in spine surgery: is there a cancer risk?

Authors:  John G Devine; Joseph R Dettori; John C France; Erika Brodt; Robert A McGuire
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-05

10.  Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Versus Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Lumbar Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shichao Liu; Yinqing Wang; Zeyan Liang; Maochao Zhou; Chunmei Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.