Literature DB >> 20444118

Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.

Amy L Sheppard1, Leon N Davies.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500 (Japan) was performed to evaluate validity and repeatability compared with non-cycloplegic subjective refraction and Javal-Schiotz keratometry. An investigation into the dynamic recording capabilities of the instrument was also conducted.
METHODS: Refractive error measurements were obtained from 150 eyes of 75 subjects (aged 25.12 +/- 9.03 years), subjectively by a masked optometrist, and objectively with the WAM-5500 at a second session. Keratometry measurements from the WAM-5500 were compared to Javal-Schiotz readings. Intratest variability was examined on all subjects, whilst intertest variability was assessed on a subgroup of 44 eyes 7-14 days after the initial objective measures. The accuracy of the dynamic recording mode of the instrument and its tolerance to longitudinal movement was evaluated using a model eye. An additional evaluation of the dynamic mode was performed using a human eye in relaxed and accommodated states.
RESULTS: Refractive error determined by the WAM-5500 was found to be very similar (p = 0.77) to subjective refraction (difference, -0.01 +/- 0.38 D). The instrument was accurate and reliable over a wide range of refractive errors (-6.38 to +4.88 D). WAM-5500 keratometry values were steeper by approximately 0.05 mm in both the vertical and horizontal meridians. High intertest repeatability was demonstrated for all parameters measured: for sphere, cylinder power and MSE, over 90% of retest values fell within +/-0.50 D of initial testing. In dynamic (high-speed) mode, the root-mean-square of the fluctuations was 0.005 +/- 0.0005 D and a high level of recording accuracy was maintained when the measurement ring was significantly blurred by longitudinal movement of the instrument head.
CONCLUSION: The WAM-5500 Auto Ref/Keratometer represents a reliable and valid objective refraction tool for general optometric practice, with important additional features allowing pupil size determination and easy conversion into high-speed mode, increasing its usefulness post-surgically following accommodating intra-ocular lens implantation, and as a research tool in the study of accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20444118     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  39 in total

1.  Reproducibility of nearwork-induced transient myopia measurements using the WAM-5500 autorefractor in its dynamic mode.

Authors:  Zhong Lin; Balamurali Vasudevan; Yi Cao Zhang; Li Ya Qiao; Yuan Bo Liang; Ning Li Wang; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor.

Authors:  Meritxell Vilaseca; Montserrat Arjona; Jaume Pujol; Elvira Peris; Vanessa Martínez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Central and peripheral autorefraction repeatability in normal eyes.

Authors:  Kelly E Moore; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Mikel Aldaba; Oriol Ferrer; Andrea Gascón; Juan C Ondategui-Parra; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Effect of undercorrection on myopia progression in 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Si Yuan Li; Shi-Ming Li; Yue Hua Zhou; Luo Ru Liu; He Li; Meng Tian Kang; Si Yan Zhan; Ningli Wang; Michel Millodot
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Changes in accommodation dynamics after alcohol consumption, for two different doses.

Authors:  Miriam Casares-López; José J Castro-Torres; Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina; Carolina Ortiz; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Accommodation in astigmatic children during visual task performance.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; Howard P Apple; Pavan Parashar; J Daniel Twelker; Mabel Crescioni; Amy L Davis; Tina K Leonard-Green; Irene Campus; Duane L Sherrill
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.

Authors:  Mylan T Nguyen; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Comparison of objective accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes between age groups.

Authors:  Byunghoon Chung; Seonghee Choi; Yong Woo Ji; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.