Literature DB >> 16155225

Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats?

Sonja Amoser1, Friedrich Ladich.   

Abstract

Several groups of fishes, among them two thirds of all freshwater fishes, have developed hearing specializations that enhance auditory sensitivity and broaden frequency ranges compared with hearing non-specialists (generalists), which lack such adaptations. It has been speculated that the enhanced sensitivities of these so-called hearing specialists have evolved in quiet habitats such as lakes, backwaters of rivers, slowly flowing streams or the deep sea. To test this hypothesis, noise levels and frequency spectra of four different freshwater habitats near Vienna, Austria (Danube River, Triesting stream, Lake Neusiedl, backwaters of the Danube River), were recorded and played back to native fish species while simultaneously measuring their auditory thresholds using the auditory evoked potential (AEP) recording technique. As a representative of hearing specialists, we chose the common carp (Cyprinus carpio, Cyprinidae) and for the hearing generalists the European perch (Perca fluviatilis, Percidae). Data show that the carp's hearing is only moderately masked by the quiet habitat noise level of standing waters (mean threshold shift 9 dB) but is heavily affected by stream and river noise by up to 49 dB in its best hearing range (0.5-1.0 kHz). In contrast, the perch's hearing thresholds were only slightly affected (mean up to 12 dB, at 0.1 kHz) by the highest noise levels presented. Our results indicate that hearing abilities of specialists such as carp are well adapted to the lowest noise levels encountered in freshwater habitats and that their hearing is considerably masked in some parts of their distribution range. Hearing in non-specialists such as perch, on the other hand, is only slightly or not at all impaired in all habitats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16155225     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Year-round variability of ambient noise in temperate freshwater habitats and its implications for fishes.

Authors:  Sonja Amoser; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  Aquat Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Sounds of shallow water fishes pitch within the quiet window of the habitat ambient noise.

Authors:  Marco Lugli
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Catherine E Carr; Glenn H Olsen; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Evidence for hearing loss in amblyopsid cavefishes.

Authors:  Matthew L Niemiller; Dennis M Higgs; Daphne Soares
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  A proposed mechanism for the observed ontogenetic improvement in the hearing ability of hapuka (Polyprion oxygeneios).

Authors:  P E Caiger; J C Montgomery; M Bruce; J Lu; C A Radford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The Effects of Continuous Acoustic Stress on ROS Levels and Antioxidant-related Gene Expression in the Black Porgy (Acanthopagrus schlegelii).

Authors:  Hao-Yi Chang; Tzu-Hao Lin; Kazuhiko Anraku; Yi Ta Shao
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  The use of anesthesia during evoked potential audiometry in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Micah S Cordova; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Can feeding sound attract flower fish (Ptychobarbus kaznakovi)?

Authors:  Mingyun Wang; Qingfu Wang; Ma Ni; Wa Da; Yajun Wang; Xiaotao Shi; Guoyong Liu
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Effects of nautical traffic and noise on foraging patterns of Mediterranean damselfish (Chromis chromis).

Authors:  Claudia Bracciali; Daniela Campobello; Cristina Giacoma; Gianluca Sarà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.