Literature DB >> 20442994

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique.

Patrick Sadoghi1, Peter E Müller, Volkmar Jansson, Martin van Griensven, Albert Kröpfl, Martin F Fischmeister.   

Abstract

The study hypothesis was that the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is advantageous in terms of clinical results and restoration of anterior-posterior and rotational laxity in comparison to bone-patellar tendon-bone single-bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstruction. We analysed 41 PTB-SB and 51 STG-DB patients using the Tegner, IKDC and WOMAC scores preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in the clinical scores. The KT 1000 side-to-side measurement showed no significant difference between groups. The STG-DB group was significantly superior in terms of the pivot-shift sign and anterior knee pain. We conclude that the outcome of STG-DB reconstruction in the mid-term was not advantageous in terms of clinical scores and anterior-posterior laxity evaluated by the KT 1000. Nevertheless, the restored rotational laxity measured by the pivot shift test was significantly superior in the STG-DB technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20442994      PMCID: PMC3014476          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1037-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads.

Authors:  Mary T Gabriel; Eric K Wong; Savio L-Y Woo; Masayoshi Yagi; Richard E Debski
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Francesco Giron; Roberto Buzzi; Flavio Biddau; Francesco Sasso
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double- and single-bundle reconstructions.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Sang Jin Park; Keun Bae Lee; Taek Rim Yoon; Hyoung Yeon Seo; Eun Kyoo Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  K Eriksson; P Anderberg; P Hamberg; A C Löfgren; M Bredenberg; I Westman; T Wredmark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

9.  Quadrupled semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year results in patients without meniscus loss.

Authors:  V J Cooley; K T Deffner; T D Rosenberg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; P Nitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  13 in total

1.  An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices.

Authors:  Ofir Chechik; Eyal Amar; Morsi Khashan; Ran Lador; Gil Eyal; Aviram Gold
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A novel tool for objective assessment of femorotibial rotation: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Philipp Ahrens; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Florian Fischer; Petra Heinrich; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Sonja Kirchhoff; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan G F Lorenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how do we perform it? Brazilian orthopedic surgeons' preference.

Authors:  Luiz Felipe Morlin Ambra; Fernando Cury Rezende; Bruno Xavier; Felipe Conrado Shumaker; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; Marcos Vinicius Malheiros Luzo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Single-bundle modified patellar tendon versus double-bundle tibialis anterior allograft ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Xiao Jing Wang; Chun Juan Wu; Jian Hui Cao; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A matched pairs comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, clinical results and manual laxity testing.

Authors:  R Siebold; T P Branch; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

Authors:  Brian T Samuelsen; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Thavatchai Tiamklang; Sermsak Sumanont; Thanit Foocharoen; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

9.  Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia.

Authors:  Alan Mahnik; Silvija Mahnik; Damjan Dimnjakovic; Stjepan Curic; Tomislav Smoljanovic; Ivan Bojanic
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 10.  Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Haukur Björnsson; Neel Desai; Volker Musahl; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Mohit Bhandari; Freddie Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.