Literature DB >> 20442220

Better estimates of genetic covariance matrices by "bending" using penalized maximum likelihood.

Karin Meyer1, Mark Kirkpatrick.   

Abstract

Obtaining accurate estimates of the genetic covariance matrix Sigma(G) for multivariate data is a fundamental task in quantitative genetics and important for both evolutionary biologists and plant or animal breeders. Classical methods for estimating Sigma(G) are well known to suffer from substantial sampling errors; importantly, its leading eigenvalues are systematically overestimated. This article proposes a framework that exploits information in the phenotypic covariance matrix Sigma(P) in a new way to obtain more accurate estimates of Sigma(G). The approach focuses on the "canonical heritabilities" (the eigenvalues of Sigma(P)(-1)Sigma(G)), which may be estimated with more precision than those of Sigma(G) because Sigma(P) is estimated more accurately. Our method uses penalized maximum likelihood and shrinkage to reduce bias in estimates of the canonical heritabilities. This in turn can be exploited to get substantial reductions in bias for estimates of the eigenvalues of Sigma(G) and a reduction in sampling errors for estimates of Sigma(G). Simulations show that improvements are greatest when sample sizes are small and the canonical heritabilities are closely spaced. An application to data from beef cattle demonstrates the efficacy this approach and the effect on estimates of heritabilities and correlations. Penalized estimation is recommended for multivariate analyses involving more than a few traits or problems with limited data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20442220      PMCID: PMC2907195          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.113381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

1.  The estimation of maternal genetic variances.

Authors:  R Thompson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.

Authors:  Robin Thompson; Sue Brotherstone; Ian M S White
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics.

Authors:  Juliane Schäfer; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2005-11-14

4.  Accurate ranking of differentially expressed genes by a distribution-free shrinkage approach.

Authors:  Rainer Opgen-Rhein; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-02-23

5.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; D Lofsvold; M Bulmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic analyses of live-animal ultrasound and abattoir carcass traits in Australian Angus and Hereford cattle.

Authors:  A Reverter; D J Johnston; H U Graser; M L Wolcott; W H Upton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Nonparametric modeling of longitudinal covariance structure in functional mapping of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  John Stephen Yap; Jianqing Fan; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Perils of parsimony: properties of reduced-rank estimates of genetic covariance matrices.

Authors:  Karin Meyer; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Factor-analytic models for genotype x environment type problems and structured covariance matrices.

Authors:  Karin Meyer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  9 in total

1.  Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population.

Authors:  Celine H Frère; Michael Krützen; Janet Mann; Richard C Connor; Lars Bejder; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A flexible estimating equations approach for mapping function-valued traits.

Authors:  Hao Xiong; Evan H Goulding; Elaine J Carlson; Laurence H Tecott; Charles E McCulloch; Saunak Sen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Bayesian adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of genetic parameters.

Authors:  B Mathew; A M Bauer; P Koistinen; T C Reetz; J Léon; M J Sillanpää
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Simple Penalties on Maximum-Likelihood Estimates of Genetic Parameters to Reduce Sampling Variation.

Authors:  Karin Meyer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A kernel of truth: statistical advances in polygenic variance component models for complex human pedigrees.

Authors:  John Blangero; Vincent P Diego; Thomas D Dyer; Marcio Almeida; Juan Peralta; Jack W Kent; Jeff T Williams; Laura Almasy; Harald H H Göring
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.944

6.  Evolutionary rates for multivariate traits: the role of selection and genetic variation.

Authors:  William Pitchers; Jason B Wolf; Tom Tregenza; John Hunt; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Performance of penalized maximum likelihood in estimation of genetic covariances matrices.

Authors:  Karin Meyer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  mbend: an R package for bending non-positive-definite symmetric matrices to positive-definite.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Dissecting high-dimensional phenotypes with bayesian sparse factor analysis of genetic covariance matrices.

Authors:  Daniel E Runcie; Sayan Mukherjee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.