Literature DB >> 20442215

Lung cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

William G Hocking1, Ping Hu, Martin M Oken, Stephen D Winslow, Paul A Kvale, Philip C Prorok, Lawrence R Ragard, John Commins, David A Lynch, Gerald L Andriole, Saundra S Buys, Mona N Fouad, Carl R Fuhrman, Claudine Isaacs, Lance A Yokochi, Thomas L Riley, Paul F Pinsky, John K Gohagan, Christine D Berg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 5-year overall survival rate of lung cancer patients is approximately 15%. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease and have shorter survival rates than patients with early-stage disease. Although screening for lung cancer has the potential to increase early diagnosis, it has not been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality rates. In 1993, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was initiated specifically to determine whether screening would reduce mortality rates from PLCO cancers.
METHODS: A total of 77 464 participants, aged 55-74 years, were randomly assigned to the intervention arm of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial between November 8, 1993, and July 2, 2001. Participants received a baseline chest radiograph (CXR), followed by three annual single-view CXRs at the 10 US screening centers. Cancers were classified as screen detected and nonscreen detected (interval or never screened) and according to tumor histology. The positivity rates of screen-detected cancers and positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated. Because 51.6% of the participants were current or former smokers, logistic regression analysis was performed to control for smoking status. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Compliance with screening decreased from 86.6% at baseline to 78.9% at the last screening. Overall positivity rates were 8.9% at baseline and 6.6%-7.1% at subsequent screenings; positivity rates increased modestly with smoking risk categories (P(trend) < .001). The PPVs for all participants were 2.0% at baseline and 1.1%, 1.5%, and 2.4% at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; PPVs in current smokers were 5.9% at baseline and 3.3%, 4.2%, and 5.6% at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A total of 564 lung cancers were diagnosed, of which 306 (54%) were screen-detected cancers and 87% were non-small cell lung cancers. Among non-small cell lung cancers, 59.6% of screen-detected cancers and 33.3% of interval cancers were early (I-II) stage.
CONCLUSIONS: The PLCO Cancer Screening Trial demonstrated the ability to recruit, retain, and screen a large population over multiple years at multiple centers. A higher proportion of screen-detected lung cancers were early stage, but a conclusion on the effectiveness of CXR screening must await final PLCO results, which are anticipated at the end of 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20442215      PMCID: PMC2873186          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  32 in total

1.  Evaluating periodic multiphasic health checkups: a controlled trial.

Authors:  L G Dales; G D Friedman; M F Collen
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

Review 2.  Chest radiography as the comparison for spiral CT in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Timothy R Church
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Is curable lung cancer detected by semiannual screening?

Authors:  K R Boucot; W Weiss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Earlier diagnosis and survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  G Z Brett
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-11-01

5.  South London Lung Cancer Study.

Authors:  F A Nash; J M Morgan; J G Tomkins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-06-22

6.  The value of lung cancer detection by six-monthly chest radiographs.

Authors:  G Z Brett
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  An evaluation of radiologic and cytologic screening for the early detection of lung cancer: a cooperative pilot study of the American Cancer Society and the Veterans Administration.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years' observations on male British doctors.

Authors:  R Doll; R Peto
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-12-25

9.  Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York.

Authors:  M R Melamed; B J Flehinger; M B Zaman; R T Heelan; W A Perchick; N Martini
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  S Sone; F Li; Z G Yang; T Honda; Y Maruyama; S Takashima; M Hasegawa; S Kawakami; K Kubo; M Haniuda; T Yamanda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Health screening for older people-what are the current recommendations?

Authors:  S G Sazlina
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2015-04-30

2.  Diagnostic evaluation following a positive lung screening chest radiograph in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  William G Hocking; Martin C Tammemagi; John Commins; Martin M Oken; Paul A Kvale; Ping Hu; Lawrence R Ragard; Tom L Riley; Paul Pinsky; Thomas M Beck; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Novel genetic variants in KIF16B and NEDD4L in the endosome-related genes are associated with nonsmall cell lung cancer survival.

Authors:  Sen Yang; Dongfang Tang; Yu C Zhao; Hongliang Liu; Sheng Luo; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Carolyn Glass; Li Su; Sipeng Shen; David C Christiani; Qiming Wang; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Novel Variants of ELP2 and PIAS1 in the Interferon Gamma Signaling Pathway Are Associated with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Yu Chen Zhao; Dongfang Tang; Sen Yang; Hongliang Liu; Sheng Luo; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Carolyn Glass; Li Su; Sipeng Shen; David C Christiani; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Potentially functional variants of HBEGF and ITPR3 in GnRH signaling pathway genes predict survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yufeng Wu; Zhensheng Liu; Dongfang Tang; Hongliang Liu; Sheng Luo; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Carolyn Glass; Li Su; Lijuan Lin; David C Christiani; Qiming Wang; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 7.012

6.  Genetic variants in ABCG1 are associated with survival of nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yanru Wang; Hongliang Liu; Neal E Ready; Li Su; Yongyue Wei; David C Christiani; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Cigarette smoking and the oral microbiome in a large study of American adults.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Brandilyn A Peters; Christine Dominianni; Yilong Zhang; Zhiheng Pei; Liying Yang; Yingfei Ma; Mark P Purdue; Eric J Jacobs; Susan M Gapstur; Huilin Li; Alexander V Alekseyenko; Richard B Hayes; Jiyoung Ahn
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  A qualitative analysis of lung cancer screening practices by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Susan Henderson; Amy DeGroff; Thomas B Richards; Julia Kish-Doto; Cindy Soloe; Christina Heminger; Elizabeth Rohan
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-12

Review 9.  Implementing lung cancer screening in the real world: opportunity, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Robert J Optican; Caroline Chiles
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Hormuzd A Katki; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Neil Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; Anil K Chaturvedi; Gerard A Silvestri; Tom L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.