Literature DB >> 23993734

Diagnostic evaluation following a positive lung screening chest radiograph in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

William G Hocking1, Martin C Tammemagi, John Commins, Martin M Oken, Paul A Kvale, Ping Hu, Lawrence R Ragard, Tom L Riley, Paul Pinsky, Thomas M Beck, Philip C Prorok.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer mortality. One of the aims of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) was to determine if annual screening chest radiographs reduce lung cancer mortality. We enrolled 154,900 individuals, aged 55-74 years; 77,445 were randomized to the intervention arm and received an annual chest radiograph for 3 or 4 years. Participants with a positive screen underwent diagnostic evaluation under guidance of their primary physician. Methods of diagnosis or exclusion of cancer, interval from screen to diagnosis, and factors predicting diagnostic testing were evaluated. One or more positive screens occurred in 17% of participants. Positive screens resulted in biopsy in 3%, with 54% positive for cancer. Biopsy likelihood was associated with a mass, smoking, age, and family history of lung cancer. Diagnostic testing stopped after a chest radiograph or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in over half. After a second or subsequent positive screen, evaluation stopped after comparison to prior radiographs in over half. Of 308 screen-detected cancers, the diagnosis was established by thoracotomy/thoracoscopy in 47.7%, needle biopsy in 27.6%, bronchoscopy in 20.1% and mediastinoscopy in 2.9%. Eighty-four percent of screen-detected lung cancers were diagnosed within 6 months. Diagnostic evaluations following a positive screen were conducted in a timely fashion. Lung cancer was diagnosed by tissue biopsy or cytology in all cases. Lung cancer was excluded during evaluation of positive screening examinations by clinical or radiographic evaluation in all but 1.4% who required a tissue biopsy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung neoplasms; Methods; Mortality; Radiography; Risk factors; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993734      PMCID: PMC3818308          DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  22 in total

1.  Lack of benefit from semi-annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high-risk males in Czechoslovakia.

Authors:  A Kubik; D M Parkin; M Khlat; J Erban; J Polak; M Adamec
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R J Ginsberg; L V Rubinstein
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  P C Prorok; G L Andriole; R S Bresalier; S S Buys; D Chia; E D Crawford; R Fogel; E P Gelmann; F Gilbert; M A Hasson; R B Hayes; C C Johnson; J S Mandel; A Oberman; B O'Brien; M M Oken; S Rafla; D Reding; W Rutt; J L Weissfeld; L Yokochi; J K Gohagan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

4.  Prognosis and survival in resected lung carcinoma based on the new international staging system.

Authors:  T Naruke; T Goya; R Tsuchiya; K Suemasu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Effect of preoperative delay on prognosis for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Renée L Quarterman; Alex McMillan; Mark B Ratcliffe; Mark I Block
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program.

Authors:  R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; L B Woolner; W F Taylor; W E Miller; J R Muhm
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-08

Review 7.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  R L Manser; L B Irving; C Stone; G Byrnes; M Abramson; D Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

8.  Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study.

Authors:  J K Frost; W C Ball; M L Levin; M S Tockman; R R Baker; D Carter; J C Eggleston; Y S Erozan; P K Gupta; N F Khouri
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1984-10

9.  Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York.

Authors:  M R Melamed; B J Flehinger; M B Zaman; R T Heelan; W A Perchick; N Martini
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Jessica Donington; William R Lynch; Peter J Mazzone; David E Midthun; David P Naidich; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Screening for early stage lung cancer and its correlation with lung nodule detection.

Authors:  Fangfei Qian; Wenjia Yang; Qunhui Chen; Xueyan Zhang; Baohui Han
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Effects of Personalized Risk Information on Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Christine Lary; Adam Black; Caitlin Gutheil; Hayley Mandeville; Jason Yahwak; Mayuko Fukunaga
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Feasibility of lung cancer prediction from low-dose CT scan and smoking factors using causal models.

Authors:  Vineet K Raghu; Wei Zhao; Jiantao Pu; Joseph K Leader; Renwei Wang; James Herman; Jian-Min Yuan; Panayiotis V Benos; David O Wilson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 9.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.