Literature DB >> 20440609

The effects of familiar size and object trajectories on time-to-contact judgements.

Simon G Hosking1, Boris Crassini.   

Abstract

Many interceptive actions involve interactions with objects that are familiar to the observer and have known sizes. Two experiments investigated how known size influences observers' perception of time-to-contact (T(c)). Participants made T(c) judgements of objects that were either ambiguously sized, standard-size in identity/familiarity, or off-size in identity/familiarity, and simulated as approaching on linear trajectories (Experiment 1), or linear versus parabolic trajectories (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, T(c) judgements were influenced by the size of the object in the three object identity/familiarity conditions; the greatest size effect occurred in the off-size condition compared to the ambiguous size and standard-size conditions. The results of Experiment 2 replicated these results and found that size effects were not reduced with displays simulating parabolic trajectories, that is, displays simulating ecologically valid free-falling objects. Taken together, the finding that T(c) judgements are influenced by object identity/familiarity does not provide support for the tau hypothesis, nor the hypothesis that T(c) judgements are based solely on optic expansion rates. However, the results do provide support for the proposition that T(c) judgements are based on a combination of rate of retinal image expansion and object identity/familiarity information, the latter information requiring observers to have prior experience with, or knowledge about, the objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440609     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2258-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  An airplane illusion: apparent velocity determined by apparent distance.

Authors:  M Hershenson; S M Samuels
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Information integration in judgements of time to contact.

Authors:  Patricia DeLucia; Mary Kaiser; Jason Bush; Les Meyer; Barbara Sweet
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-10

4.  Gravity as a monocular cue for perception of absolute distance and/or absolute size.

Authors:  J S Watson; M S Banks; C von Hofsten; C S Royden
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 5.  Size-distance invariance: kinetic invariance is different from static invariance.

Authors:  M Hershenson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

6.  Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception.

Authors:  P R DeLucia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.

Authors:  J R Tresilian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

8.  Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates.

Authors:  R W McLeod; H E Ross
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Visual information about moving objects.

Authors:  J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information.

Authors:  B Abernethy; D P Gill; S L Parks; S T Packer
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predicting where a ball will land: from thrower's body language to ball's motion.

Authors:  Elise Prigent; Clint Hansen; Robin Baurès; Cécile Darracq; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Emotional effects on time-to-contact judgments: arousal, threat, and fear of spiders modulate the effect of pictorial content.

Authors:  Esther Brendel; Heiko Hecht; Patricia R DeLucia; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Time-to-Collision Estimations in Young Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Austin M Svancara; Rajesh Kana; Haley Bednarz; Gabriela Sherrod; Kristina Visscher; Benjamin McManus; Despina Stavrinos
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  Neural correlates of personal space intrusion.

Authors:  Daphne J Holt; Brittany S Cassidy; Xiaomin Yue; Scott L Rauch; Emily A Boeke; Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell; Garth Coombs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Silvio Gravano; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23

6.  What are memory-perception interactions for? Implications for action.

Authors:  Loïc P Heurley; Laurent P Ferrier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-08

7.  Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action.

Authors:  Björn Jörges; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Simulated proximity enhances perceptual and physiological responses to emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Olena V Bogdanova; Volodymyr B Bogdanov; Luke E Miller; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Synergies between optical and physical variables in intercepting parabolic targets.

Authors:  José Gómez; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Visual cues for manual control of headway.

Authors:  Simon G Hosking; Catherine E Davey; Mary K Kaiser
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.